User talk:Boopdebop

Welcome!
  Hello, Boopdebop!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, paul2520 💬 21:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Condominiums in Canada, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * The item at issue is to a 1977 Ontario Government Commission report and the only digitally available source. It happens to be on a blog, as it had been lost until the blogger found it and uploaded a PDF version. It is a unique circumstance.
 * This is the item you've taken issue with - https://condomadness.info/contents-Kealey-Report.html Boopdebop (talk) 03:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Condominiums in Canada, you may be blocked from editing. ''I take issue with a number of things, including your "new here so I don't want to lose content". See my edit summary for more detail. Now stop edit warring please.'' Drmies (talk) 13:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Hi, I provided accurate citation, and removed the problem item. Consequently I am not sure what the disruptive editing content is. I've checked your edit summary, which was specifically about a citation (blog).
 * Can you be more specific, as it would greatly help? Thank you. Boopdebop (talk) 16:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, I am taken aback by suggesting I'm trying to take or make issues. Re: your last comment, and there is a misapprehension. In BC Canada the owners association you note is a non-for-profit the Government considers legitimate, and is comparable to the one listed under the "Ontario" section on this page. It is not a single owners association, but one of 3 in the Province that is a liaisons are representatives of the system. (Confirmation at: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/housing-tenancy/strata-housing/more-help-and-support/strata-associations) How about this I retry, by undoing your removal and redo with more care to detail? The other items also came from valid sources. I am new and your sharp tone and conclusions appear to spring from misunderstandings. Boopdebop (talk) 17:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * You need to cite SECONDARY sources--that's how Wikipedia works, with reliable, secondary sources. See Secondary source. I'm not convinced I sound "sharp", but what I do see is you reverting and reverting without addressing the actual concern. Drmies (talk) 19:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)