User talk:Bopter

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Cornell Rockey 18:04, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Plantations of Ireland
The language you're introducing to that article is heavily slanted and, frankly, not supported by the Amazon bookselling links and other references you've introduced. Please try to gain consensus for your edits on the talk page rather than trying to force-feed your version into the encyclopedia. Dppowell (talk) 15:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Heather Mills
I have put your bit about the pledge at the end of the Activism section, and have formatted the reference properly.--andreasegde (talk) 15:13, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

File:450px-HighDefShare 20080107.GIF listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:450px-HighDefShare 20080107.GIF, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Sherool (talk) 22:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

William Dickson
Do you have an article prepared? Justin talk 13:56, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes, but I'm struggling with a 'cite error'. I've put it live now, perhaps someone will help me fix it. Thanks.Bopter (talk) 14:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll have a go. Justin talk 15:06, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * And done, your source appears to have a number of factual errors. Dickson wasn't a military representative, he was given the job of flying the flag.  Vernet wasn't banished either, for example Brisbane his deputy returned in March of 1833. Vernet himself left in 1831 before the Lexington raid and it was only in the late 1830s when he made extravagant financial claims to the British Government that he was prevented from returning.  The first military representative was actually Lt. Smith in 1834.  The original intention was to police the Falklands with an annual visit by a warship and it wasn't till the Gaucho murders was a permanent presence established.  Sorry but this is a common problem in Falklands articles where history is corrupted by competing modern claims.    I've other reliable sources and will expand the article later.  Ciao.  Justin talk 15:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Justin, this is helpful. I'll also expand outside the initial sources I came across. Bopter (talk) 15:36, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Madeline Mulqueen for deletion
The article  Madeline Mulqueen  is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Madeline Mulqueen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - A l is o n  ❤ 03:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Knuttel


The article Jonathan Knuttel has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication of WP:notability. No independent WP:reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 18:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Jonathan Knuttel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Knuttel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jonathan Knuttel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 11:41, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Margaret Burke Sheridan
Sorry but I reverted you edit because you can't just copy a load of prose from findagrave as you did with Margaret Burke Sheridan. We can't even verify the information, though it may be accurate, because they are not a WP:RS being contributed to by many different individuals without ant oversight. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 19:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Understood. Thanks. Bopter (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bridie monds-watson


A tag has been placed on Bridie monds-watson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Eeekster (talk) 21:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Solution selling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SPIN. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Poloniex


A tag has been placed on Poloniex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red dogsix (talk) 19:39, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

December 2019
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Christopher Columbus, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Doug Weller talk 19:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freddie Burns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Burns. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Le Marteau. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Holy Cross College, Strabane, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Le Marteau (talk) 19:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fordham Preparatory School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameron Young.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Actavo


The article Actavo has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Current sources include 2 interviews and 1 source with a couple of paragraphs. Other online sources are just passing mentions."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sungodtemple (talk) 22:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)