User talk:BoredOut

St. John's Episcopal Church (Richmond, Virginia) and other articles
Hi, i noticed you've added external links to St. John's Episcopal Church (Richmond, Virginia) and other articles. I appreciate your adding NPS Travel itinerary links to relevant pages, as those are great resources. However, your additions are messed up, there is a problem in the URL that you provide, perhaps an extra slash (/), so the external links don't work. Can you please go back and fix the URLs? Otherwise, keep up the good work.... :) doncram (talk) 20:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, I'm afraid that most of the links you've added are in violation of Wikipedia's external links guideline, and your mass additions border very close on linkspam. While the NPS itineraries are a great resource, they're often only tenuously related the articles to which you're adding them. Please review the guidelines and remove the links from the articles that are not directly related to the itineraries. - Eureka Lott 23:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Indeed, please use more discretion when adding external links to articles. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. Even if it's for the National Park Service, that many links, most of which are not specific to the topic at hand, is still linkspam. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I fail to see how the links being added by this user are linkspam. The sites are non-commercial (NPS). The link is about the Underground Railroad and is being added to sites that are part of the Underground Railroad. Rather than accusing this user of linkspam, perhaps we could suggest that more specific links are added, rather than just the home page? This site actually has pages dedicated to most of the subjects of the articles it had been added to. For example, look at what I just added to the F. Julius LeMoyne House - it's more specific than a link to the home page and is, without argument, quite relevant. --Midnightdreary (talk) 20:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I noticed your addition of a Massachusetts Maritime NRHP travel itinerary link to Effie M. Morrissey (aka Ernestina), and then SchuminWeb's reversion. I restored a link, to the more specific Ernestina article within the NRHP itinerary.  And I posted to SchuminWeb's talk page asking Schumin to stop deleting.  However, SchuminWeb has a point that there is not need for multiple articles all linking to the very same general webpage (the NRHP travel itinerary for all the Massachusetts Maritime sites).  You could add one link to that general webpage from, say, the List of Registered Historic Places in Massachusetts general article.  For individual NRHP articles, you should just link to the specific NRHP Travel Itinerary webpage that is about that specific NRHP property.  (For example, you should add a specific link to the Ernestina NRHP webpage, to the Effie M. Morrissey article.)  And you should read the links provided by SchuminWeb about how to edit wikipedia and respond, rather than persisting in following a course of action that you have been warned about.  That is not to say that SchuminWeb is entirely correct necessarily, as Midnightdreary and I both seem to disagree at least partly with SchuminWeb (although I could end up agreeing with Schumin in the end, if this is talked out properly).  If you don't pause and discuss, then I could well agree with schumin that blocking you could be appropriate. doncram (talk) 16:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)