User talk:Boredsohere

HI PEOPLES!!! POST ON MY PAGE HEHE! Boredsohere (talk) 17:12, 17 May 2011 (UTC)5/17/2011 I spelled caesery right. it is not spelled ceasery i know because I play the game so often

Unblock?
I have just realized I was spelling caesery wrong and I am deeply sorry for it, promise to read The My First Artcle Page if I do get unblocke, you could even quiz me :D but further more I beg for forgiveness I would love to be hope to be unblocked, I also promise I will post in sandbox every time before I try to create an article. Boredsohere (talk) 18:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

You spelled Caesary wrong
On the off chance that you get unblocked, thought I'd let you know that probably the biggest problem with your 'Caesery' article was that it's actually spelled 'Caesary.' You'd still need to do many other things for your article to not be deleted (and reading any of the many 'Your first article' links on this page would help), but spelling it right would be a good start. Good luck to you. -- Fyrefly (talk) 17:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Boredsohere (talk) 17:45, 17 May 2011 (UTC)oh... ok I get what your saying i will fix that what are the other problems?


 * I wouldn't worry about it unless you actually get unblocked (because right now you can't fix anything), but really Your first article can tell you everything you need to know. Mostly, it's sources that you need in order to show notability. For now, you should focus on trying to understand why you've been blocked. Deleting all the warnings will not help you with that. -- Fyrefly (talk) 17:53, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You were blocked because you kept doing the same thing over and over after you were told not to do that. You attacked an editor who nominated one of your articles for deletion. You do not appear to understand basic requirements for editing on Wikipedia. As advised above, I'd strongly suggest that you read WP:YFA, and then describe here what you were doing wrong, based on your understanding of that advice. Improved spelling, grammar and communication would be a bonus. Nominating people for adminship should be your last concern.   Acroterion   (talk)   18:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Ya ok i get that, and thanks for the help and if there is anything you can do to attempt to get me unblocked please do so,(also dont take this as a bribe) I am going to take 3 people each month and nominate then for adminship and if you want me 2 ad you just ask :) )

I think its a great concern and its such a concern i will add you right now. Also i didnt "attack" anyone.
 * Upon examination, you didn't make an attack per se, but I'm serious about my advice: you need to read and understand WP:YFA and explain here what you were doing wrong before you can be unblocked. You were posting commentary in articles, creating something close to nonsense articles, and still do not appear to understand any of the fairly basic rules. I've removed the spare unblock request: one at a time, please.   Acroterion   (talk)   18:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Are you saying that if I were to read it then type in what I did wrong I would be unblocked?
 * If it shows an understanding of what you were doing wrong and how you will undertake to not repeat it, you stand a good chance of being unblocked.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:48, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

ok but I have realised what I have done wrong, I spelled Caesary wrong and Repeated to do it, but I was unknowing I spelled it wrong.


 * That's not why you were blocked, and you certainly haven't read and understood YFA: there's a lot of reading there. Again, You do not appear to understand basic requirements for editing on Wikipedia. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but you appear to be very young, and may not have developed some of the skills needed to work productively on writing the encyclopedia: time and work on writing and composition skills will help that.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

you are correct, also if that wasnt the reason I was blocked what was the reason? If you could give me one more chance it'd be great I will test all of Edits and Creations in andbox please give me a chance...

I've had a look over your contributions so far, and I see articles created... Also the following edits... All in all, not a very good start. What we need to know is that you understand why all of those were wrong, and we need to be able to have confidence that you can contribute in a meaningful and mature way. It may be that you are very young and don't appreciate exactly what an encyclopedia is - if so, then that's not your fault, but it may be better if you leave well alone until you're a bit older. But for now, what I'm going to do is give you a belated Welcome template, below, and I suggest you have a good read of the many useful links it contains, which should help you to understand what this project is actually all about. So please, have a good read and a good think, and don't submit another unblock request until you really understand the problem -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment
 * River Toomer (deleted twice) - nonsense
 * Wowza2 - claim to be your own website, not notable
 * Caesery (deleted 3 times) - non-notable computer game
 * This removal of content with edit reason placed in the article itself - you should have perhaps added cn tags, and/or discussed it on the Talk page
 * Removal of refs and categories from the same article, replaced with "The references here werent exceptable I want a Speedy Deletion"
 * Addition of "Greatest warriors" section, which is personal judgment - we must not add our own personal opinions to Wikipedia articles
 * Addition of fake "Article for deletion" template to the talk page of an article
 * More personal opinion (plus presumably test edits)

OK, I read the younger user thing I KNOW THAT STUFF!... anything else?

Welcome
Yes I repeated to make those articles because I thought there was nothing wrong with them, also Im 14 but I have ADHD so I'm somewhat less mature. I spelled Caesary wrong I put Caesery on accident And What do you want me to do read all the links?
 * }
 * OK, well, if an admin deletes one of your articles, then clearly they think there is something wrong with it, or they wouldn't have deleted it - so if it happens and you don't understand why, you should ask them and not just recreate it. The links? I provided them for you to use to help educate yourself on what Wikipedia is and how it works, because I think you'll need to demonstrate some kind of understanding in order to be unblocked - how much use you make of them is entirely up to you, but I would strongly suggest you at least read and understand WP:N, WP:V and WP:RS. (Also, I would suggest you don't color your comments - it's not necessary and can be confusing, as colors often indicate links - but if you really want to do it, please remember to close it with a tag or everyone else's subsequent additions will be the same color) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:58, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Ok, if I can make a proper article with at most two flaws would that show you I understand what to be doing?
 * What you would need to do to be unblocked has been explained above, and you need to read and understand it. Essentially, you need to explain why what you did was wrong, and what you plan to do in future - and to do so in a way that convinces a reviewing admin that you really do understand it all properly (I'm just giving you some advice - I won't do the review myself). Also, you will need to show that you have made an effort to read some of the core policies that you have been given links to, and that you understand them. For example, have you actually read any of the links? How about WP:YFA? Best wishes -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:18, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Boredsohere (talk) 14:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)5/18/2011 Yes I actually have read one of the links, the one on personal attacks and I've read thw WP:YFA I'm planning on reading the one on vandalising here shortly.
 * OK, that's good - take your time, there's no rush :-) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Boredsohere (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC) ummm... lol there kinda is a rush I don't want anyone beating me to a correct Caesary article lol I see that your new to adminship... Good Job :D you made it :]
 * Thanks - but you should be aware that there appears to be a draft article about Caesary at someone's user page, User:Chzz/Caesary - I've asked them about the status of it -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * PS: The pic worked fine, but I'm afraid you'll need to remove again. If you check File:Sonic 1991.png you'll see it's an example of non-free media, which means that someone else owns the copyright and it can only be used in articles with a suitable non-free media rationale - and that means it can't be used in User pages. (Yep, there's an awful lot to learn, isn't there?) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:51, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Boredsohere (talk) 14:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC) awwww... ya, I just read the WP-Speedy I think I know what I did wrong...(does that mean I cant make a caesery page?)
 * Not sure - will have to wait and see what that user says. (I'm off for a bit now, so won't have any more time to help today) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Just to make sure everyone is aware, this article has been deleted via AfD previously (this is after it was moved to Chzz's userspace). Given its varied history, great care should be taken to ensure any article created addresses the concerns raised at the AfD lest it simply be speedy deleted. Again. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Boredsohere (talk) 15:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC) I vandalised a page by spelling Caesary wrong also, I removed parts of an article instead of asking for a speedy deletion( what I removed turned out to be right...)
 * (You need to rethink that - it has got nothing to do with spelling Caesary wrong. You really need to read WP:N and WP:V, and read WP:CSD again and think about A7 - that's the reason your page was deleted -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC))
 * I know I said I wasn't going to review your request, but I did this one to save you from a perhaps harsher decline from someone else. You really do need to take your time about this (which I understand is hard for you) and follow the advice you are being given - and please note I won't be able to review another unblock request myself as I have already done one) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

A7
Oh OK I broke the A7 rule gotcha


 * Okay, I'm not going to review your unblock request at the moment. I'd like for you to read this and indicate that you understand it. If you change your unblock request so that it clearly demonstrates that you understand why you were blocked, and that you won't repeat that behavior, we may be able to unblock you. Also, since you indicated that you are young, I would like for you to read this. —DoRD (talk) 17:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Just saying "I broke the A7 rule" is nowhere near sufficient - we need to be convinced that you *understand* it and understand how you broke it - and you need stop ignoring all the things people have asked you and actually start trying to address them. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Question for administrator
--Boredsohere (talk) 16:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You haven't asked a question. If you have a question for an administrator, please ask it and then re-add the template. However, if you're simply trying to draw attention to the unblock request above, please don't use the helpme template for this. The unblock template alone is sufficient. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 16:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Don't remove unblocks
While you are blocked, you should not remove declined unblock requests from your Talk page, as reviewing admins will need to see the whole set of them to help them make a decision - I have reinstated the one which I declined and which you removed -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)