User talk:BorgQueen/archive8

Literary Criticism
Hi.

Depending on your opinion of/tolerance for Ayn Rand, you might find her Romantic Manifesto and her posthumous The Art of Fiction interesting reading. (Both books originated in the 1960's, so very recent literature will be missed, and modernism/postmodernism is given short shrift). The first book is a collection of essays on aesthetics, not all focused solely on literature, but commenting on naturalism versus romanticism, from Victor Hugo to Mickey Spillane.

The second book is a transcript of a ten part lecture series on fiction writing. It goes into detailed criticisms of good and bad writing, with excerpts from authors like Thomas Mann and Sinclair Lewis. The principles apply today. If you benefit from those works there are also academic works like What Art Is and others.

μηδείς (talk) 19:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --BorgQueen (talk) 19:32, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Water hieroglyph.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Water hieroglyph.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Arthunter (talk) 14:18, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Vandal you blocked
The vandal you recently blocked has been vandalizing pages related to the Kuwaiti and Omani royal families consecutively for the last four days with several different IP addresses, adding the same meaningless phrase every time. They change their IP every time they reach a certain number of warnings. Would it be feasible to impose a longer block on this user, and would this even be effective on an IPv6 address? I'm unsure at this point whether to request multiple page protection, provided that all the vandalism is coming from one user. Elspamo4 (talk) 00:54, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The user has been indef blocked now. Thanks. --BorgQueen (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Artificial cloud
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Artificial cloud &mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb (talk) 18:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Victor Ponta image
You probably don't know this but you should not be re-creating the same image that is available on commons under a different name, and in a lower quality, the image is automatically cascade-protected once added to the ITN template..the only time images are brought over to enwiki is when it would stay on the main page for a while, most images do not stay longer than 3 days ..If people started bringing images from commons over to enwiki everytime it was used on the main page, we would be filled with low-res duplicates on enwiki..-- Stemoc 11:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I will delete the image soon after it is no longer on the MP. --BorgQueen (talk) 15:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

St Vincent elections
Right now the Main Page is outbalanced. Can you restore the St Vincent elections? --George Ho (talk) 01:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Never mind. The Page is already updated, and it is balanced. George Ho (talk) 00:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps we'll let fate decide. I previewed the Next Day Main Page, and the left side will outbalance the right. Of course, there are newer nominations, but they are very unlikely to reach consensus. So that leaves St Vincent as our savior for a while. --George Ho (talk) 23:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks but what is it for? I've been rather sporadic these days. :D --BorgQueen (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

You will be assimilated!
We are the Borg. Your contributions will be assimilated into our knowledge. Resistance is futile. Winterysteppe (talk) 15:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bouteflika (Algiers, Feb 2006) cropped.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Bouteflika (Algiers, Feb 2006) cropped.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Iago Qnsi (talk) 20:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't want to spam your talk page, so I'll stop posting speedy deletion warning tags, but I'm CSD tagging a bunch of old temporary main page images that never actually got deleted. You can check my contributions if you really wanna see all the images I'm tagging. Cheers, Iago Qnsi  (talk) 20:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Request to re-evaluate article deletion based on notability for Joseph Atwill
I would like to appeal a decision made in 2007, that Joseph Atwill fails to meet Wikipedia notability criteria. Here is the original decision record:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joseph_Atwill

Since this decision, Atwill has continued to accumulate references in reputable sources as well as individual blogs, and his book was translated into German and published by Ullstein Buchverlage. Contrary to the original decision, Ulysses Press is also a reputable publisher in the field of spirituality. Atwill's book, Caesar's Messiah, continues to be a best-seller in its category, and it is covered in an article in German Wikipedia. While many reviews are negative, the importance of his work is in some ways vindicated by the vehemence of the replies.

He has also published another book, "Shakespeare's Secret Messiah", through CreateSpace. In Atwill's view, the greater revenues from self-publication outweigh the importance of any reputability criteria that Wikipedia might establish -- but every effort has been made to ensure a quality product.

Here are links to secondary sources on Atwill's work, at varying quality levels.

'Reputable Sources'

http://www.villagevoice.com/film/caesars-messiah-rome-invented-jesus-new-doc-claims-6436318

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/story-of-jesus-christ-was-fabricated-to-pacify-the-poor-claims-controversial-biblical-scholar-8870879.html

http://www.focus.de/wissen/mensch/geschichte/interview-jesus-war-den-kaisern-eine-hilfe_aid_356977.html

http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/146983.das-kreuz-mit-dem-heiland.html

http://community.zeit.de/user/berndkoch/beitrag/2008/12/25/das-christentum-eine-propagandaluege-der-flavier

http://www.ullsteinbuchverlage.de/nc/buch/details/das-messias-raetsel-9783793420910.html

'Notable Critics' (That is, these critics have their own Wikipedia bio articles)

http://ehrmanblog.org/conspiracy-nonsense/

http://www.robertmprice.mindvendor.com/rev_atwill.htm

http://freethoughtnation.com/a-conversation-on-the-caesars-messiah-thesis/

http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/archives/4664

Other reviews of CM

http://postflaviana.org/introduction-flavian-origins-theory-christianity/

http://caesarsmessiahdebunked.com

http://www.tektonics.org/books/csmessrvw.php

http://www.evidenceunseen.com/theology/book-reviews/a-critique-of-joseph-atwills-covert-messiah/

https://tomverenna.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/no-joe-atwill-rome-did-not-invent-jesus/

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/wwjtd/2013/10/joseph-atwill-has-not-proven-that-jesus-was-made-up-by-the-romans/

http://www.logosapologia.org/ceasars-messiah-conspiracy-theory-is-easily-refuted/

http://www.catholic.com/blog/trent-horn/no-the-romans-did-not-invent-jesus

http://www.thenazareneway.com/Caesar's%20Messiah%20Commentary.htm

http://sidneyrigdon.com/vern/2005Atwl.htm (No review, just a copy of most of the book)

http://thriceholy.net/atwillf.html

http://hoaxbusterscall.blogspot.com/2013/10/caesars-messiah-debunked-joseph-atwills.html

http://www.skepticfriends.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6883

http://www.the-savoisien.com/blog/index.php?post/Joseph-Atwill-Caesar-s-Messiah

https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/tag/flavian-dynasty/

http://www.skepticfriends.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6883

http://www.covertmessiah.com

Reviews of SSM --

http://www.authorsden.com/categories/article_top.asp?id=72328

http://www.ancientworldreview.com/2014/07/book-review-shakespeares-secret-messiah-by-joseph-atwill.html

http://www.angelfire.com/sk/syukhtun/shakespeare.html

http://occupy--yourself.blogspot.com/2015/08/i-recently-finished-reading-joseph.html

https://destee.com/threads/josephus-the-satirist-joke-on-the-annuciation.83309/

Atwill citations already on Wikipedia --

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_Messias-Rätsel (nice article in German)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_conspiracy_theory (link in 'other reading' section)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emilia_Lanier (link in footnotes)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ_myth_theory (bullet point, but no link, in 'Documentaries' section)

JerryRussell (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

No response after six days, so I created a deletion review request:

Deletion review for Joseph Atwill
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Joseph Atwill. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. JerryRussell (talk) 20:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Firesleeve
Good Day, and may the Schwartz be with you. The above referenced page appears to be an advertisement for an offshore vendor, with a trade name masquerading as a product type, whereby the vendor or surrogate appears to seek some free exposure courtesy of Wikipedia but cannot trouble himself to come up with any sort of back-up, like product or application photos, outside references etc. There was also a firestop product by this name some years ago out of BC, as I recall, which seems to be rather different from the subject matter of this article. I thought I'd nominate Firesleeve for deletion. The authors have had plenty of time to put meat on this bone but have not done so. Normally, I am an inclusionist, not a deletionist, but pure product advertising is a tad much, even for me. I have no idea how to nominate an article for deletion, so I am asking your assistance, Oh Mightiest of Queens. All the best, --Achim Hering (talk) 00:12, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for removing that advertisement, which was masquerading as a legitimate article! --Achim Hering (talk) 02:42, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Industrial Revolution/GA2
Hi. I've opened a GAR on the Industrial Revolution article for which you are or have been a significant contributor. I have concerns that it does not quite meet current GA criteria regarding a number of issues, including layout, image use, and inline citations, and that length, prose, and use of external links also need discussing. Following the guidelines at Good article reassessment, I'm letting you know in case you're interested in helping to resolve the concerns, though you are under no obligation to do anything. See Talk:Industrial Revolution/GA2 for more details.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  15:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Fatal Alcove Malfunction -- Unable to Regenerate
As you can see here, I decided to abandon all my previous accounts. However, the system rejected the username I chose. Can you please change it as I can't edit that page now and my old login info is long gone? Thanks.

DarklitShadow (talk) 01:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

ASL Hungary Flight 7332 and aviation template
I think your actions are highly inappropriate. You closed an AFD after 4 days as WP:SNOW and its hardly a show with two editors arguing keep. Note- I nominated the crash article for deletion. Your actions before hand at the yearly templates verged on edit warring. The consensus of the WikiProject Aviation is that any article with a existing article can go in the templates. A article at AFD remains in the templates till the AFD is closed.

IMHO you improperly closed a AFD. You may have violated WP:INVOLVED because of your actions at the template which clearly mark you as unbiased so far whether a AFD should be closed or not. See you at ANI....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I first removed the link to the article from the template because I saw no reason to think the article had any realistic hope of surviving the AfD and therefore was about to close the discussion in the first place, per WP:SNOW. My net connection comes and goes, so I was planning to close the discussion slightly later when my connection was more stable, which I indeed did within a couple of hours, as closing an AfD was a more complicated process than simply removing the link. It was a simple administrative job but perhaps my edit comments weren't detailed enough, but I am not involved in this matter; I simply have noticed the AfD while passing by. The number of editors arguing keep are irrelevant as it is not a vote. The only rationale they've offered is that it is "not really that common," which is, frankly, absurd. But you know what, if you'd like to have a fresh set of eyes to look at it, please feel free to try at AN/I. --BorgQueen (talk) 13:00, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

As promised
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)  Thank you.

Doubt
Does this name violate WP:USERNAME. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.141.161.8 (talk) 22:35, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello BQ. Here is a link to make things easier to check on . All edits were May of 11 and none since. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 22:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins) .MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Baking banana listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Baking banana. Since you had some involvement with the Baking banana redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 06:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Help in Japanese Wikipedia
Hi from Germany! Please excuse my English as it is not my mother tongue. A German text from me would sure be more polite. I just wrote a new article about a very special lake at my hometown: Bucket Lake. The lake and its genesis is documented by film. From the beginning, the lake has also attracted attention in Japan. And so the short documentary is now translated to Japanese by German pupils (see this article in German Newspaper). I would be very happy if you could start at least a stub at the Japanese Wikipedia. Maybe this encourages somebody to expand it. Thank You! -- Jan Tietje (talk) 23:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC) PS: I also asked User:Dcmacnut for help.

Well I dropped the ball on that one
Um... oops? Sorry about that, and thanks for catching my mistake. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news
 * A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
 * Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
 * Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news
 * When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
 * Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
 * The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries
 * JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Sugar
Hey,

Just FYI I changed the page protection on it :)--5 albert square (talk) 15:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Temp file
Hi. Un-necessary anymore, I think? XXN, 21:29, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Jyllands-Posten-pg3-article-in-Sept-30-2005-edition-of-KulturWeekend-entitled-Muhammeds-ansigt.png
Greetings, is the full protection File:Jyllands-Posten-pg3-article-in-Sept-30-2005-edition-of-KulturWeekend-entitled-Muhammeds-ansigt.png still necessary? If problem anon edits occurred semi protection would suffice. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:52, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

About a specific plant.
hai there..!! .I am susivishal. recently i was reading an article list of extinct plants. In that article, in modern extinction, in the asia section there was plant mentioned as 'ruzhildalani' or ruzhil from India in 1995.

I humbly request you to give detailed description and information about that plant.

Susivishal (talk) 07:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)susivishal

Better source request for File:Julia furuta-toy.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Julia furuta-toy.jpg

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of 2005 Sydney terrorism plot for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2005 Sydney terrorism plot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2005 Sydney terrorism plot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sport and politics (talk)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey
Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Japanese Book
Hello BorgQueen - can you translate the book titel from Japanese into english? http://book.asahi.com/reviews/reviewer/2011072701520.html I need this for a research. the translation via google is: African body temperature, knit in a small story. Best.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 04:57, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Postcard Boy (絵はがきにされた少年). --BorgQueen (talk) 20:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 07:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

ITN request: slight modification of wording of Sinai attack entry
Hi, BorgQueen! Even though I am an admin, I'm not frequently involved with ITN stuff.

I want to say the mosque involved in the recent is near bir-al-abed, not in it, as a CNN article stated "Gunmen fired on people fleeing after explosions took place at the mosque between Bir al-Abed and the city of al-Arish." - attack is at 31.039458, 33.34783; 'El Arish City' is here https://goo.gl/maps/8KhQEeYXYKT2

Would it be okay if I made the change straight away, or should I ask first?

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 03:34, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Monster Girl


The article Monster Girl has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Complete WP:FANCRUFT, no indication of notability whatsoever."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 00:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Talk:Egg and chips for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talk:Egg and chips is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Egg and chips until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MrDemeanour (talk) 12:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated&#32;should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)


 * End of an era! Wwwhatsup (talk) 04:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated&#32;should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux  Talk 13:05, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your service at ITN. Hope to see you back around there at some point. Best,  Spencer T• C 03:27, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, Spencer. I'm still around. Thanks for remembering me. —BorgQueen (talk) 07:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Precious
Miss you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Oh, hello. Thanks for the sweet message. I've been busy IRL but I'm still here from time to time. —BorgQueen (talk) 07:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)


 * That's great. It's getting sweeter: today is another day of 10 years! Happy 2019! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)


 * A year ago, you were recipient no. 2082 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome back!

 * What Bonadea said! -- Orange Mike  &#124;  Talk  02:59, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Request
I really don't know a lot of admins right now. I am glad you are back. There seems that anyone that is an administer is pretty busy. I hope you can help me. I check my stats probably once a month to check the info. I am having a problem. I was startled to see that 9,000 edits of mine have been deleted. The last time I looked at my reverts a year ago the number under a couple hundred. First of all can you see these of these reversions? I am concerned at this point that there might be an ongoing issue. If there are thousands of reversions that I don't know about I won't really be able to understand and prevent any future er specific issues. Best Regards,   Barbara    ✐  ✉  23:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmm I'm not familiar with these technical aspects. You probably better get help elsewhere. --BorgQueen (talk) 03:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

2019; Bangladesh fire
Please do not copy from sources, as what you added to 'causes' was incredibly similar. Thanks, Qwerty number1 (talk) 16:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC).
 * Oops, I've deleted it just now. Thanks for the heads up. --BorgQueen (talk) 17:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Classic Cola (Sainsbury's)


The article Classic Cola (Sainsbury's) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable product"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 22:11, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
   

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:28, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Cancer glyph.png


The file File:Cancer glyph.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi!, please help
Hello friend, could you please check my sandbox and put the title of the would-be article in Japanese please? I mean, between "". Hope you understand me. Kind regards. --LLcentury (talk) 10:55, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ashton Eaton 2 Daegu 2011 cropped.jpg


The file File:Ashton Eaton 2 Daegu 2011 cropped.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Nebo05(js) cropped.jpg


The file File:Nebo05(js) cropped.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Hinduism
 WikiProject Hinduism

Hello, BorgQueen. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!

 Subscribe

- Discuss this newsletter

Contribute

Subscribe/Unsubscribe

Archive

Sent by on behalf of WikiProject Hinduism. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Cheers

 * I can't drink alcohol due to health reasons but thanks. --BorgQueen (talk) 07:58, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jilani Humayun for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jilani Humayun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jilani Humayun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  11:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Davis cropped.jpg


The file File:Davis cropped.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Redundant to File:Jefferson Davis portrait.jpg which is hosted on Commons"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

File:HarlanEstate cropped.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HarlanEstate cropped.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of extinct plants for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of extinct plants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of extinct plants until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:23, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks lol --BorgQueen (talk) 09:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

FAR for Durian
I have nominated Durian for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 17:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ATryn


The article ATryn has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This product no longer exists and should be deleted"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Please vote in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election
Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.

The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)