User talk:Borgiegoldcoast

April 2012
Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Matthew Johns. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 06:22, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Matthew Johns, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LibStar (talk) 06:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Matthew Johns, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LibStar (talk) 07:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dan Ginnane


A tag has been placed on Dan Ginnane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Yash  t  101   09:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 3AW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Tim Lane


 * Matthew Johns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Warren Smith


 * NRL on FOX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Warren Smith


 * Triple M Network (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Nathan Brown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

DMG Radio Australia
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from DMG Radio Australia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Reubot (talk) 06:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to DMG Radio Australia, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 07:40, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at DMG Radio Australia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bidgee (talk) 10:06, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:10, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent unhelpful editing, including repeatedly removing content from articles, with no attempt to explain your reason, and no response ever to messages about the problems with your editing. If you believe that you have good reasons for edits that others challenge, then please explain those reasons. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:31, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Network Ten, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 23:16, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bidgee (talk) 03:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)