User talk:BoriStrong

Welcome!
Hello, BoriStrong, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Hi, I was wondering how to get organized, e.g. to insert my credentials on this my page, to be better introduced, - this option, I see other guys have it, is not found by me yet.

--QB_2014 00:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Usually the user page (not this page, the user talk page) would be the place to write about yourself as an editor, but I wouldn't bother overmuch with that - we're here to write an encyclopedia, not to write about ourselves. There are lots of userboxes that can be used to give a quick overview, but again my personal advice would be not to bother too much. Huon (talk) 01:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Cosmonautics Day
Sorry, but your addition is inacceptabe by English wikipedia rules. It was rejected three times. Please don't reinsert. This is also against wikipedia rules. Please use page Talk:Cosmonautics Day if you have any questions. - Altenmann >t 04:41, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

I am still confused and I need a citation (1, important) and a link to those "inacceptabe by English wikipedia rules" made my first, naturally expressed contribution denied. So I still was wondering what is happened, being critically distracted from this "my relaxation space and time".

Thanks.

--QB_2014 20:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Well, Immediately, after starting my participation in this project my initial contribution was denied without reasonable explanations. That is just abnormal in civilized, even internet, community. Sure I am open mind and I am able to understand that necessary corrections must be done if that is required by any rules, but complete ... "shut up!"-like ... this is already out of bounds of decency misconduct.

This denial in English is especially important for my freedom of expression. After some disappointed time after refusal, I have naively, switched to Russian version, being sure as if the initial article in a Russian jurisdiction the Russian edition shall be done too; I did it being still fascinated, acting exclusively in bone fide (in a good faith) and even got supported by two others. Firstable everything was fine, until some guy claiming about himself as very worth one, intruded in my contribution and uncompromisingly cancelled that. In response I wrote my expression in a completely peaceful, but feuilleton manner, just for fun for both from us. Actually, to his dignity, he got it. Another was not so smart and blocked my further contribution forever, claiming that he had learned something and somehow from our founder's lecture.

Well, fellow, I got him and his style immediately. Believe me, no any nostalgia, but the real disgust only. First my reaction was that read by me an allegedly Jimmy Wales' disappointment with Russian subdivision at all and Kaspersky Lab, partially - too much allowed, something like that.

In development of the forced toward me argument I want to offer to your judgment m natural reaction supported by finding the real one explanation in Russian that I have translated especially for you, my fellow.

“Transmissible corruption from foreign countries hath eaten the pristine health of the souls and bodies of Russia; the coarseness of manners had decreased, but a resulted free place was been quickly filled with flattery and swinishness; the folk has survived of an old mind, but was not able to amass a new one – so hence we will die as who we really are, as fools!"

by Merezhkovskii, "Peter and Alex, "1905 (the quote from the Russian National Corpus, see References). as sourced at http://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/хамство and at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_National_Corpus So the classic of Russian culture told us and that was happen toward my initial contribution exactly. What are you thinking about the forced toward me conflict, labeling, and that "swinishness" overall? Go ahead, fellow! Be detailed and sourced, please.

Thanks, --QB_2014 01:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * You took an article on a Soviet holiday and added lots of content that was rather off-topic, supported by references to Wikipedia itself (which doesn't consider itself a reliable source) and to pages like the JPL that didn't mention the holiday at all. Those additions were considered unhelpful, and I have to agree. For more on reliable sources see WP:Identifying reliable sources. Huon (talk) 01:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)