User talk:Boris-majstorovic

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Boris-majstorovic. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tansprocess, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 22:39, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Tansprocess for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tansprocess is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tansprocess until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Rrburke (talk) 22:47, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tansprocess


A tag has been placed on Tansprocess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ubiquity (talk) 23:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Deleted page
I can't see where this concept is really used or mentioned anywhere. On the talk page you said that it was "accepted at the academic level", but a teacher accepting a graduate thesis does not mean that the concept of transprocess is automatically accepted by the academic community or that it is notable. All that it really means is that the teachers thought that the concept had merit enough to accept your paper. (I'm assuming that you are Majstorovic himself due to your user name.) I couldn't find any academic papers, newspaper articles, book mentions, or anything to show that this concept has been the focus of study in any independent and reliable source (WP:RS). It's ultimately something that you came up with one day (WP:ONEDAY) and just because you came up with the concept does not make it automatically notable. The page was also somewhat promotional in tone, which comes across like you were trying to post the concept on Wikipedia in an attempt to have the concept gain more notice and importance. This is not what Wikipedia is for- we're not a repository for original thought, as article subjects have to have gained coverage in reliable sources. You said that you were going to provide sources in a few days, but that also poses a problem: you have to show notability in the here and now and you'd have to show that transprocess was discussed by someone other than yourself (WP:PRIMARY) or by anyone that is personally involved with developing the concept or has a tie to you in some way. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)