User talk:Boris.avatar

Speedy deletion of Fields of Glory online
A tag has been placed on Fields of Glory online requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onorem♠Dil 12:48, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Fields of Glory online
A tag has been placed on Fields of Glory online requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 12:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not recreate Fields of Glory online. The page has now been deleted three four times because it is a completely non notable game. You can check our WP:NOTE guideline to see some of the basic requirements for article subjects. Fram (talk) 12:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Conflict of interest explanation
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. --McGeddon (talk) 12:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Could you confirm whether you are the Boris Reznik listed as a designer for Fields of Glory? If you are, you are in breach of Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines listed above, and should not be writing an article about your own game. --McGeddon (talk) 13:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Boris, I have moved your work in progress on Fields of Glory to your userspace, here: User:Boris.avatar/Fields of Glory online, since Fields of Glory online can still be subject to speedy deletion. Marasmusine (talk) 14:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Block notice
Because you have again created this page, for the fifth time in just over 2 days, even though it has been explained to you that the page is not suited for Wikipedia, you have now been blocked for 24 hours. Please don't recreate this page again after the block has expired, as that will probably lead to an indefinite block. Wikipedia is not the site to make promotion for your own game, there are countless specialized websites for this kind of thing. We are an encyclopedia, we report on things that get discussed in newspapers, mainstream magazines, science journals, ... Fram (talk) 14:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your |talk page by adding the text. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org.

MfD nomination of User:Boris.avatar
User:Boris.avatar, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Boris.avatar and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Boris.avatar during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:56, 2 January 2016 (UTC)