User talk:Boris Cheshlarov

July 2019
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 16:56, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Skopje.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 12:20, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

April 2023
Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to North Macedonian passport. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  -  Sumanuil  '''. ''' (talk to me) 09:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

June 2024
Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 17:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)