User talk:Born2cycle/scratch

Even though supposedly heavily sources, the following statement in the intro is not supported by the sources cited:

In particular, this statement implies a singular "libertarian philosophy" pf which there are two derivative forms, but none of the sources support this. I hereby request that the statement be deleted.

Let's look at each of the sources:


 * Bevir, Mark. Encyclopedia of Political Theory. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 2010. page 811;
 * Bevir does refer to "three major forms" but says nothing that indicates they are related other than by name and being political philosophies, as the statement in question claims.


 * Vallentyne does refer to lesser known version he does refer to as left-libertarianism, this is a different use from that referenced in the statement in question. We know this because the left-libertarianism linked to in the statement in question refers to
 * Vallentyne does refer to lesser known version he does refer to as left-libertarianism, this is a different use from that referenced in the statement in question. We know this because the left-libertarianism linked to in the statement in question refers to


 * Christiano, Thomas, and John P. Christman. Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Contemporary debates in philosophy, 11. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. [ page 121];
 * Lawrence C. Becker, Charlotte B. Becker. Encyclopedia of ethics, Volume 3 Encyclopedia of Ethics, Charlotte B. Becker, ISBN, page 1562;
 * Paul, Ellen F. Liberalism: Old and New. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007. page 187; and
 * Roderick T. Long, "Towards a Libertarian Theory of Class," Social Philosophy and Policy 15:2 1998, 303-349: 304-308.
 * Roderick T. Long, "Towards a Libertarian Theory of Class," Social Philosophy and Policy 15:2 1998, 303-349: 304-308.