User talk:Borogrovnik

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Anjulie. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anjulie&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Deletions at Anjulie
Any simple "inaccuracies that are disturbing to the subject and her fans" should be corrected from reliable sources, not arbitrarily deleted. If any contentious content is not reliably sourced then it must be deleted (with accompanying edit summary) per Biographies of living persons policy. Regards, 220  of  Borg 04:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Any content disputes such as this should also be raised and discussed on the articles Talk page.
 * Please be aware that using one or more account(s) abusively, known as "Sock puppetry" or recruiting meatpuppets (friends or coworkers who share your point of view and are recruited to support you) is not permitted. I mention this as 5 'named' accounts and 2 IP editors have made very similar edits to this page, just in April 2012.
 * Also be aware of the "three-revert rule" against edit warring. Wikipedia is a collaborative endeavour, please keep this in mind.

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Serado for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 02:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)