User talk:Borsmd/sandbox

You've gathered some really important info, and the next step is fine-tune it so that it works well within the context of Wikipedia (good practice in writing for a specific audience). Here are some aspects to consider: Touch base with any questions!
 * Because St. Pancras already has an extensive entry in Wikipedia, your entry should just link to that but not cover the same territory. Most of the "Martyrs" section seems to overlap with the St Pancras entry, but the last paragraph should stay because it's specifically about his cult in Rome and is a good lead-in to the discussion of the catacomb itself--your specific topic.
 * That said, the "History" and the "Topography" sections have the core of a good entry on their own.
 * Remember to add links to other Wikipedia entries throughout, and also your citations (items are listed below but there are no note #s in the body of your text)
 * What's your distinction between the Bibliography (it's fine to use Italian sources but none of them were included in the bibliography you posted to D2L so I wasn't sure of their role) and Works Cited (general websites that aren't credible sources unfortunately, and they aren't cited in your entry regardless).
 * Also, please add an image or two.

AMcClanan (talk) 20:26, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi! Wow you added a lot - I'm very excited for it to be implemented on the wiki page and what a cool opportunity we have. I agree that there is a bit of fine tuning - just a general implementation of Wiki's built in reference system, but I'm sure you'll get around to that. Similarly, there are some numbers without dates, and lastly, are we using CE or AD? There doesn't seem to be a consensus on Wiki, sadly, but as a class, I wonder.

Similarly, Wikipedia seems to have an amazing tool for citations that is a little laborious but still useful, if you get around to using it - I highly recommend it when you swing back around to this assignment.

Have a great day and good luck!

Jullian93 (talk) 23:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from Kenan Koenig
It looks like you have created a fair amount of really good textual content! I really like your use of linking to other Wiki pages as it draws your attention to other sources of interest, should the reader wish to go there. My only suggestion, if at all possible, would be to add some type visual representation directly onto your wiki page. As a "non-reader" (someone who prefers fewer words to more visuals), it would really help me relate to what you have written if I have something visual to compare it with. Thanks! - Kenan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenan Koenig (talk • contribs) 07:22, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from Prof McClanan, 12/7
It doesn't look like earlier feedback about removing all of the duplication with existing related Wikipedia entries has been addressed unfortunately. Email if you are able to fix those issues by Sunday, thanks.AMcClanan (talk) 22:42, 7 December 2018 (UTC)