User talk:Bosekgn

Welcome!
Hello, Bosekgn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Schleich. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -A la d insane (Channel 2)  18:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Discuss edits, not editors
Please, in the future, discuss the merit of edits, not the merits of editors. It's surprising enough that a brand new editor nows about this ban, but it is not only irrelevant to the edits involved, but also has long since been overturned, and I'm free to edit what I like without restrictions (well, within the restrictions which apply to every editor, not just me).

If you are objecting to the inclusion of the maziply link, then fine, that can go. But that is hardly a reason to reinclude outdated information (from 2007), or direct links (bare urls) to other commercial companies. I'll simply remove the link you are objecting against. In the future, please use the WP:BRD cycle: if you make an edit that gets reverted, don't revert again but use the article talk page to discuss the reason why your change is needed or better. And don't discuss the editor who reverted you as that is usually not heplful and not relevant (your edit doesn't get better, and the other version doesn't get worse, if the other editor has been sanctioned for unrelated things in the past). Fram (talk) 15:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at administrator's noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Fram (talk) 06:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Schleich; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''Stop the crap about Fram too. They are not blocked here''  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * @Bosekgn: Regarding Schleich, there will be no external links embedded in the article as they are regarded as promotional, aka spam. In case the previous comments are unclear, you will be indefinitely blocked if you repeat any comments about other editors unless at an administrators' noticeboard. Johnuniq (talk) 07:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)