User talk:Bosharivale

Hi there. I have reverted the major edit you made to this article, as it appeared to be a substantial change to an article that often has heated discussion surrounding it, and also appeared to include a non-neutral point of view. I would strongly suggest that before engaging in wholesale changes to articles, you discuss such changes on the talk page of the article, in this case Talk:Rape. Please also ensure that you aren't marking major changes as minor, as this may confuse other editors. Thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Non-neutral how? If so, then those parts you balance by adding a counterpoint. But no, you reactively strip out and suppress the absolute entirety, also utterly bypassing the article's own talkpage in doing so. Incredible! So your hooey about there being something special about the prospect of 'heated discussion' leads you to strip out referencing from the Encyclopaedia Brittanica (no less) and 12, that's right !!!12!!! relevant article categories.
 * An item on talk has been opened (by me) for your appraising comment in one-by-one, reasoned, and considered fashion. I will grant that you know enough about Rape to have raped the entirety of my well-thought-through contributions on exposing the subject for Wikipedia readers. Because of that you really need to take a good look at yourself and what you bring to the enhansement process with what you do: a good, long and hard look.Bosharivale 02:31, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Language choices on the rape page are often determined by consensus. Also you take a number of liberties with the language that are not supported by documentation. If you can find such definitions in reliable and verifiable sources, then you could make a case for your changes. I will also respond on the talk page. Thank you. Phyesalis 02:42, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Collaboration during World War II
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references.

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary.

Please remember to mark your edits as minor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thanks!

Mdbrownmsw 20:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)