User talk:Bosihiov

Welcome!

Hello, Bosihiov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Abby Martin does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Viriditas (talk) 04:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

January 2015
Hello, I'm Viriditas. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Abby Martin have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 03:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I just want to say that in addition to the childishness of your edits, they are also inaccurate. Martin has been talking about and writing about these topics for many years before RT ever approached her, so calling her a Russian propagandist is absurd. The facts remain: except for Democracy Now! (which does have a leftist bias), there is little to no criticism of the United States in the major, corporate-owned media.  RT, according to Martin, was the only media outlet who would offer her a job.  Criticizing your country does not make one a "propagandist", it makes one a patriot who demands improvement.  You seem to ignore the real propagandaists, FOX News, for example, which cheerleaded two wars based on false premises, encouraged the illegal torture of innocent civilians caught up in a militarized dragnet, and gave the right wing conservative noise machine a stage for the most delusional and vile propaganda outside of Moscow, including the wholesale robbery of the US treasury by the libertarian thieves masquerading as "politicians", who expected the public to cover their tab while they were busy deregulating the financial sector with hidden riders and free blowjobs for Wall Street--all the while working to destroy the fundamental rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution by replacing it with corporate defenders and regulatory capture.  The real propaganda is all around you and yet you remain blind to it.  We learned after eights years of the ransacking of America by criminals in the highest offices of the land that the national security state had taken over, and that no corporations would ever be tried for the crime, and we learned that the next eight years resulted in more of the new boss, same as the old boss, with little to no change. When you are ready to come to terms with your silent complicity in this invisible, "managed democracy", where the leaders are selected, not elected, in a propaganda system that you obviously support, you may then have something important to say, not before. Viriditas (talk) 03:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)