User talk:BosnaSRB RS

Welcome!
Hello, BosnaSRB RS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

April 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tvrtko I of Bosnia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Z oupan 21:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DVdm (talk) 13:14, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tvrtko I of Bosnia— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 13:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Tvrtko I of Bosnia
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at the AN3 noticeboard (permalink). There appears to be a chance you will be blocked indefinitely. EdJohnston (talk) 21:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

'''Users: DVdm, Surtsicna clear case of an agenda account. Their sources are meaningless!'''


 * Tvrtko I of Bosnia


 * Titles
 * In 1377, he signed himself "King of Serbs, Bosnia, the Maritime and the Western Parts"

King of Serbs, Bosnia, the Martitime and West Parts - Wiki


 * look at my sources


 * 1.
 * Mavro Orbini
 * Il regno de gli Slavi, hoggi correttamente detti schiavoni; page 358
 * Mavro Orbini says that Tvrtko crowned in Orthodox monastery Mileševa. Metropolitan monastery Mileševa crowned Tvrtko.
 * Tvrtko is the Orthodox Christian.
 * 2.
 * Željko Fajfrić
 * Željko Fajfrić(2000). Kotromanici


 * tekst/text
 * "To je ohrabrilo Tvrtka da se u Mileševu, na grobu Svetog Save kruniše za kralja (26. oktobar 1377.). Osim kraljevske titule uzeo je i ime Stefan (Stefan Tvrtko I)"
 * translate
 * "It encouraged the Tvrtko to be in Mileševo, at the tomb of Saint Sava crowned king (October 26th 1377). Besides the royal title and took the name Stefan (Stefan Tvrtko I)"
 * Tvrtko is the Orthodox Christian.
 * 3.
 * Vladimir Ćorović


 * and other relevant historians

unblock my account--BosnaSRB RS (talk) 18:26, 24 April 2015 (UTC) First Иn the Charter of 1382, Tvrtko says that he follows the faith of our first parents, Messrs Serbian. Which means that he was an Orthodox Christian. Second Holy Archdeacon Stefan - Slava of King Tvrtko Kotromanića. link: http://www.spc.rs/sr/vesti_iz_eparhije_budimljanskonikshitshke_6 spc.rs - The Serbian Orthodox Church 3rd To be crowned a king in the Orthodox Church, he must be an Orthodox Christian.
 * None of those explicitly claim that he was Orthodox, only that he was crowned in an Orthodox monastery – SYNTHESIS.--Z oupan 08:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

--BosnaSRB RS (talk) 17:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Continued edit warring at Tvrtko I of Bosnia
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Non-stop edit warring at various articles including Tvrtko I of Bosnia. This resumed after the one-week block issued to you on 22 April for warring on the same article. (See the link to a previous AN3 report that appears above). If you would like to have this block lifted we would need to be convinced you will follow Wikipedia policy in the future. So far you are totally convinced you are right and are oblivious to all feedback. This is not a good combination. EdJohnston (talk) 23:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Unblock

 * Continuing to argue a specific content dispute is not a good way to be unblocked. If you would like to have this block lifted we would need to be convinced you will follow Wikipedia policy in the future. Your theory that you were blocked 'because you wrote factors' doesn't make any sense. What does it mean to 'write factors'? EdJohnston (talk) 15:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * He meant "facts". His English is not so good, obviously.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

EdJohnston Admit you're wrong. Do not be haughty. --BosnaSRB RS (talk) 16:35, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Since this is my block that is being appealed, I can't decline the unblock request myself but I am allowed to disable the user's talk page access if it appears they are not trying to sincerely address the concerns expressed in the previous declines. See WP:GAB for how to create a convincing unblock request. EdJohnston (talk) 19:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:16, 25 January 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)