User talk:BossKoolaid7910

Speedy deletion nomination of List of births, marriages and deaths in Emmerdale


A tag has been placed on List of births, marriages and deaths in Emmerdale, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion/List of births, marriages and deaths in Emmerdale. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ミラP 17:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

List Of Births Marriages And Deaths
Can someone recreate this page? I have tried to but it will be a lot of work to do.

I don’t know why it was removed but can one of you re create it. BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Coronation on street characters full names
Which wise guy is deleting my edits on the characters? I keep adding there full names and it takes me so long to do!!! BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 16:52, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

I thought I told you to STOP deleting my edits.

FICTIONAL CHARACTERS DO HAVE MIDDLE NAMES OK?!??! BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary that did not appear to be appropriate, civil or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ''The middle names are being removed because only credited names should be used in the lead. The Emmerdale births, marriages and deaths list was deleted following this discussion, it is unlikely to be recreated because the content will probably not differ from the original.'' - JuneGloom07 Talk  02:32, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

I was getting angry with people deleting my edits. BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 15:11, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Tim Metcalfe (Coronation Street), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''Middle names are removed per MOS:TV. It is nothing personal to you.'' Soaper1234 - talk  13:05, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Tim said his entire name in an episode. Don’t get the wrong end of the stick! BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 18:51, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

I didn’t do anything wrong BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Middle Names.
I am getting infuriated whenever someone’s deleting my edits.

Loads of the Emmerdale,Corrie and Eastenders characters have said THERE ENTIRE names in an episode. fictional characters do have middle names because why would they be saying that?

Like when Tim said his name was “Timothy Osmond Metcalfe” or Nick saying his name was “Nicholas Paul Tilsley”

I’m getting no respect on this wiki, so please I beg you stop deleting the middle names PLEASE! BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 19:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * This is not just any Wiki, this is Wikipedia. You need to cite your sources when changing information. Middle names are generally not included in the first words of the article because they do not matter. They do appear in the alias field of the infobox often.Rain the 1 21:09, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

They do matter. And I call this wiki for short bc why not. I’m still going to keep adding middle names until everyone stops removing it!!! BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 22:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

It’s never going to end. Nobody can see this matter, but I do. BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 22:49, 12 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Please stop disrupting articles by adding content that does not adhere to MOS:TV. A lot of full names or middles names of fictional characters are not used in the credits and are not notable, so their addition could be considered fancruft. If you feel strongly about a particular name being included, perhaps start a discussion on the relevant talk page to gain consensus about its inclusion. Maybe try to find a reliable source that mentions it's origin or significance, which could be added to the body of the article. Also, please don't edit war or be uncivil towards other editors in your summaries. Using all caps, for instance, comes across as aggressive. Thank you. - JuneGloom07 Talk  23:46, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

I’m not trying to be “aggressive” and I’m not disrupting anything. BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 18:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

I suffer from ASD. So I basically cannot help that. BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 18:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mick Carter. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ''You have been asked by multiple editors to stop your disruptive edits, but you seen to have ignored the advice and links you have been given. I'll ask you one more time to please stop adding uncredited, unsourced names to the leads of articles.'' – JuneGloom07 Talk  02:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

IM NOT DOING ANYTHING WRONG I PROMISE. All I’m doing is making the pages realistic. All source is from episodes etc. I suffer from ASD and PDD so I’m sorry if your enraged at me BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Explanation
Look. I get your giving me advice but my edits are not disruptive. All I’m trying to do is make them more realistic. All sources are from past episodes and I check for there facts.

I am not trying to break any rules I swear!!! My edits are not disruptive and yet everyone is being so harsh to me.

I suffer from ASD, I sometimes cannot help these problems so please give me some respect and I’m sorry if your enraged at me.

I am not trying to disrupt any edits! BossKoolaid7910 (talk) 17:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 5 albert square (talk) 21:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)