User talk:Bossplw

Minor Comments
Hi mate, what time is good for you tomorrow, i think earlier will be best so im thinking around midday? let me know mate --JackMayhew (talk) 17:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jack, around midday sounds good! See you then Bossplw (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Pat, Fancy a meeting a couple of time in this upcoming week before the presentation? Let me know. JackMayhew (talk) 09:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

I am free pretty much whenever (apart from working this weekend), so whenever is convient for you. Bossplw (talk) 10:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Pat, thanks for your recommendations on reliable resources for researching Leo Burnett's business. I have found an awesome site that has the complete history of his company and has many further reading references that i can look into, where are you at with your section mate? Regards --JackMayhew (talk) 13:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I have put my section up on the page, I am hoping to have more interaction with other contributors. I have ordered a book called 'The Leo Burnett Book of Advertising' hoping to extend my references and improving the article further. I'll let you know if there is anything else it in it worth adding. How are you getting on? Bossplw (talk) 17:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Leo Burnett
Hey Pat, Do you have any idea to what exact pages our group should edit? I was looking at Leo Burnett and noticed that more could be contributed to Leo Burnett Worldwide. Other pages we could look at include some of the creations by Leo himself. Whats your take on this? Jack Greenaway (talk) 09:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

There are several aspects that we could actually look at, such as: His company, his ad campaigns and his personal life. All these could do with improvement Bossplw (talk) 09:42, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Ok, rad. Today we should have a good session finding sources to help us improve the areas we're interested in. Jack Greenaway (talk) 09:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

I've had a go at editing the introduction. Check out my sandbox. I think also it would be a good idea to create a "Works" section, where his work that was previously mentioned in the intro could go, what do you think, is it necessary? If not, they could remain in the intro, but just with reference. (like the one you found) Jack Greenaway (talk) 18:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I am going to start working on my section of the article. I am also investigating if I can get permissions to use more imagery for the article. I have also found something for Mayhew's article. Bossplw (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Sandbox
Hey Pat, just having a nosey in your sandbox and noticed you have said you found a reference in '2011'. This is correct? Other than that the referencing looks good. I've gone ahead the added a link, and a reference ("His first job was as a reporter..."). Check it out in my Sandbox User:JGreenaway27/sandbox. Cheers Jack Greenaway (talk) 17:44, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

I was just playing around with referencing, It is not entirely correct as I wasn't able to finish editing it Bossplw (talk) 23:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Patrick, You said earlier that we are going to study Leo Burnett and i think that its a good idea that you come up with earlier that we each study a section on our chosen topic and then all switch areas so we can create engagement via editing each others pages. Thanks -- JackMayhew (talk) 11:20, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jack, It would be a good idea to improve each others articles. I have some books and websites which would be a great place to start our research. Bossplw (talk) 11:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Pat, I think if you use the talkback feature Toni was talking about it will reply to my page directly. -- JackMayhew (talk) 11:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Ok Jack, I am just testing out talkback. Bossplw (talk) 11:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Leo Burnett Update
Hey Pat, I noticed you removed the 'Death' bit up to the Introduction - I'm not sure this really fits. Maybe we should add a 'Death' section? And also to add a bit of flow, could we move your section below Jacks, as the 'biography' ends ".... Leo Burnett Company". What are you thoughts? Jack Greenaway (talk) 22:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * PS. love the image, HO HO HO. Jack Greenaway (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

What you said has better flow to the article so do what you think fits best. I moved the section up because it was a bit empty, a whole heading only had one sentence to it, so I though you could integrate it better into your biography section. I added an image to support the article, glad you liked it. Bossplw (talk) 22:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Saul Mandel
Just wondering if you'd be interested in creating an article on this illustrator (who was also involved in the Jolly Green Giant). See, , ,. We've had an OTRS request for one. Dougweller (talk) 10:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the offer, I am currently quite busy working on the Leo Burnett article for a couple more weeks for a university assignment. After this, I will try my best to work on this new article. I have had a look at some books and journals, it seems that there is not too much on him. Although, thank you for the sources, it will give me a place to start. Bossplw (talk) 12:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Leo Burnett
You and Jack Mayhew deserve a WikiCookie for the good work put into improving the Leo Burnett page. Yum. Good job!

Speedy deletion nomination of Stanley Park Brewing


A tag has been placed on Stanley Park Brewing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 1292simon (talk) 01:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stanley Park Brewing


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Stanley Park Brewing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dylsss(talk contribs) 19:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

status
As reviewing administrator, I found it necessary to delete the article. The other article you mentioned was not promotional, whereas this one was mainly an extensive list & description of the various beers produced  DGG ( talk ) 07:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Makes sense, if that section is taken off then the article could stay? Bossplw (talk) 07:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It really needs another reference, preferably from another newspaper.  DGG ( talk ) 06:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)