User talk:Bostonbiologist

Welcome!
Hello, Bostonbiologist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  LGA talk  edits   06:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre


A tag has been placed on Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  LGA talk  edits   06:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nahum Sonenberg.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Nahum Sonenberg.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  LGA talk  edits   06:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Almost everything has a copyright.  LGA talk  edits   06:18, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Fair use would not be allowed - not for living people.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 21:46, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Oscar Munoz (executive)
Look, the incident on the United flight where a passenger was dragged off was disturbing, but it’s not so disturbing it needs to accommodate a good chunk of this CEO‘s profile. It’s more appropriate for the main United Airlines article. Or hey! How about the article devoted to United Airlines Flight 3411. --SpyMagician (talk) 02:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)