User talk:Bostonite01310

Album class ratings
Hi - I saw your message on Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars talk page about how albums are rated. Since I was the person who added the ratings for the two albums you mentioned, I thought I'd better explain myself. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars is correct that it's a subjective rating, entirely down to the person reviewing the page. Many editors give a rating based on the length of the article, but personally I try and take into account the quality of the sources as well. In the case of Cosmos, for example, when I rated it, pretty much the only sources were B.I.'s own social media, which fails WP:PRIMARY, and Naver, which I know some editors question whether it passes WP:RS. Since then, you have expanded it with critical reviews, charts, etc. so if I were reviewing it now, I probably would give it a C-class. But this isn't a "fixed" assessment, it's just an estimate to give editors an idea of how much more work is needed on the article and how it compares in quality to other articles. I wouldn't normally change an existing rating unless it was very obviously overrated, e.g. if the article just had one paragraph of text and two sources, and the writer of the article has self-assessed it as B-class... well, that would obviously be absurd and I would change it to stub-class. But I hope my assessments didn't offend you, they were just quick judgements on the state of the article as it was at that moment. And the important thing was to add the WikiProject tags, so that other members of those WikiProjects know the article exists and they can start improving it. Richard3120 (talk) 20:52, 8 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking your time to leave me a message. I was not offended by your assessments at all. I was just curious about the reassessment process considering the articles have been improved since the last rating.
 * Related to the Twitter sources and Naver sources, I agree that it's not ideal to cite them. But it's hard to find good English language sources for the album release process. It's easier to find good sources for the album announcement or post-release, but not for the release process itself unfortunately. But I'll keep that in mind. Thanks again Bostonite01310 talk 23:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know, there is currently a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums to remove the importance rating entirely. Richard3120 (talk) 17:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know, there is currently a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums to remove the importance rating entirely. Richard3120 (talk) 17:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Love or Loved Part.1 (EP)
Hello from the DYK team. I can't find the hook fact in the article. "... that, when discussing his music project Love or Loved, K-pop star B.I stated that he felt "the opposite of love" was not "I don't like you", but rather "I loved you before"?"

This fact needs to be in the article (with a source of course). BorgQueen (talk) 03:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)


 * You seem to be offline... nevermind, I took care of that. 😉 BorgQueen (talk) 04:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Awesome, thank you! Bostonite01310 talk 19:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Love or Loved Part.1 (EP)
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Yayy awesome!

Your future music's record-related articles
Hi Bostonite01310, please do note of WP:SINGLEVENDOR, WP:BADCHARTS, and WP:ALBUMSTYLE for your future created album/song's article(s). I had to removed quite a bunch of contents that violates SINGLEVENDOR and BADCHARTS, and also had to correct the Release history section being placed at the wrong sequence to align with ALBUMSTYLE. Thanks and happy editing!  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  16:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I have never added chart related information to any of my pages because I don't understand charts, and neither am I ever planning to. I usually leave that to the editors with knowledge in that area. But noted. Bostonite01310 talk 17:09, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Bostonite01310 Noted, no worries.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  17:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Love or Loved Part.1
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Love or Loved Part.1 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 03:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I've completed my initial assessment and I am awaiting a second reviewer to check the Korean language sources. In the interim, I'm happy to work with you on the issues I've identified. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, thank you for reviewing the article. Sure, let me know th issues you've identified. Bostonite01310 talk 14:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The issues are in the initial assessment on the GAN review page. voorts (talk/contributions) 14:20, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah thank you! I'll look into it when I get a chance. Bostonite01310 talk 15:04, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Love or Loved Part.1
The article Love or Loved Part.1 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Love or Loved Part.1 and Talk:Love or Loved Part.1/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 02:22, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Love or Loved Part.1
The article Love or Loved Part.1 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Love or Loved Part.1 for comments about the article, and Talk:Love or Loved Part.1/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 15:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Love or Loved Part.2
Hello, Bostonite01310. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Love or Loved Part.2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Love or Loved Part.2


Hello, Bostonite01310. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Love or Loved Part.2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)