User talk:Boszormenyi.zsolt

Welcome!

Hello, Boszormenyi.zsolt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Olaf Davis (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

RSOE EDIS
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of RSOE EDIS, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://cc.rsoe.hu/index.php?pageid=about_index. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RSOE EDIS
A tag has been placed on RSOE EDIS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Skäpperöd (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from RSOE EDIS, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Skäpperöd (talk) 19:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

RSOE EDIS
The request for speedy deletion was declined, as the copypasted text seems to be CC-licenced. However, there are still several issues that need to be fixed, as outlined in the maintenance templates. The most important is WP:NOTE: make sure you include reliable, verifiable, third-party sources to establish notability and neutral coverage. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Boszormenyi.zsolt. While Skäpperöd was writing that I deleted the article because it was written like an advertisement or promotional material for the site and not an encyclopedia article. If you think you can write a neutral article on the topic I'd be happy to restore the text for you to work on, but as Skäpperöd says you'll need coverage in third-party sources to establish that it's 'notable' enough for Wikipedia.
 * I hope having the article deleted wasn't too disheartening. I'm leaving a welcome message at the top of this page with some helpful links that might be of use, and please feel free to contact me at my talk page if I can help or you have any questions. Cheers, Olaf Davis (talk) 19:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)