User talk:Bottastical

January 2021
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Murray Rothbard. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.   Caius G. (talk) 16:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Capitalism. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

  Caius G. (talk) 16:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Augusto Pinochet, you may be blocked from editing. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 16:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 21:53, 22 January 2021 (UTC)