User talk:Boulder2929

Welcome!
Hi, Boulder2929. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Nat Gertler (talk) 04:48, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Richard C. Lukas, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 04:49, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Richard C. Lukas— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:03, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Reverting
Hi Boulder, if you continue to remove well-sourced content, you're likely to be reported and blocked from editing. Instead of reverting, please go to Talk:Richard C. Lukas and argue your case. In case you have any connection to Lukas, please read our conflict-of-interest (COI) guideline and be sure to disclose any COI. Many thanks, SarahSV (talk) 18:31, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, I'm Hurricane111. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Richard C. Lukas. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hurricane111 (talk) 20:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Richard C. Lukas. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:27, 15 October 2019 (UTC)