User talk:Boxoffice2k16

Welcome!
Hello, Boxoffice2k16, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vision (2017 film), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GSS (talk) 06:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Vision (2017 film)


The article Vision (2017 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * WP:FUTURE: Required independent reliable sources to support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk) 06:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Shikari (2016 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Additionally, in these edits, you add unsourced box office information, but you also use the phrase "blockbuster hit", which is a hyperbolic term that has no place in a neutral encyclopedia. We don't describe things subjectively. We wouldn't describe a film as "funny" or "beautiful", and we don't use exaggerated words like "immense" and "blockbuster" and "super hit" and "failure" and "flop" and "massive response" which you added here. Lastly, per community consensus at WT:ICTF (check the archives), we no longer use the INRConvert template in the infobox for a number of reasons, including that it arbitrarily converts money to US dollars when there is no clear reason to do so, and there are issues with inflation, for instance when a 2009 film is converted to 2016 US dollars. Another reason, is that doing the calculations in the infobox presents a great deal of clutter. It would be appreciated if you'd please not add this to the infobox anymore. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

WP:NFF and Vision (2017 film)
Hi there, in this edit I redirected Vision (2017 film) to Ashok Pati because there was no effort made to establish that the film had already begun principal photography, which is Film Article 101. Per WP:NFF:
 * Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun. (Emphasis theirs)

Once you can demonstrate with direct references (see WP:REFB for help) that the film has begun filming, then the article can be restored. Since the above guideline represents widespread community consensus, the article should not be restored before that time, as that would be disruptive. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)