User talk:Boxofficekerala123

June 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Annan Thambi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Same here, and note that Filmibeat is not considered a reliable source per WP:ICTF. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Improper tone for an encyclopedia, copyright violations, language proficiency, Filmibeat, etc
Hi there, re: these edits, I have a few concerns. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) I mentioned yesterday that Filmibeat is not considered a reliable source per WP:ICTF, so it's unclear why you used it again. Please stop using Filmibeat, and please use sources that are considered reliable by the community. If you continue to submit insufficient references, you risk being blocked.
 * 2) Content you added can be found verbatim here, particularly the "whopping" and "raked in" language. You may not copy content from other sources and add them to Wikipedia. This is a basic academic concept. Copying is considered academically dishonest and lazy, and in this case, is also considered a copyright violation. Wikipedia won't tolerate this. All prose content must be written in your own words. If you submit any more copyrighted content, you will be blocked.
 * 3) With regard to your language proficiency, much of the other prose you submitted is full of grammatical and typographical errors. Proper nouns should be capitalised. Punctuation should be placed where normal punctuation is placed. Note that competency is required at Wikipedia. If your English skills are not strong, then you should avoid writing prose and stick to areas that you are proficient in, or you should edit at the Wikipedia in your native language. If you continue to submit problematic English prose, you risk being blocked.
 * 4) There are significant tonal issues with the content you submitted. Wikipedia presents content from a neutral point of view. We are not here to write promotional copy, or to drool over our article subjects. Writing about how a subject is "making history" or receiving "overwhelming response" or having an "amazing start" or that the film is in the "50 crore club" or that it received "whopping ___" or that it "raked in" money -- this is all gloriously improper tone for an encyclopedia. If you can't tell the difference between neutral and promotional, peacock tone, you will very quickly wind up blocked.
 * 5) Please don't mark your edits as minor unless they are for cosmetic changes like typographical fixes, spelling fixes, adding wikilinks, or things of that nature. See WP:MINOR.

June 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:49, 13 June 2017 (UTC)