User talk:BoyBlueSky

Discretionary sanctions alert for abortion and post-1932 American politics
Doug Weller talk 12:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
If you continue the highly tendentious editing you have been doing at Focus on the Family, you are likely to be topic banned or otherwise sanctioned. Bishonen &#124; talk 12:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC).

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Focus on the Family has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. The reason for this warning should be obvious. Doug Weller  talk 09:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Focus on the Family. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Doug Weller talk 09:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Focus on the Family
Hey there, looks like you kinda got beat up as a result of your good faith effort to add some balance to the FOTF article. If you check the talk page there again you'll see they came down on me pretty hard as well, just for suggesting that the article use the word "evangelical" rather than the pejorative "fundamentalist" in the lead sentence. Then someone wanted to challenge my assertion that it was pejorative! And then a couple of others trying to insist that the reliable sources were on their side. After I pointed to several solid sources for "evangelical", one of the Wikipedians responded with six to support "fundamentalist". When I demonstrated how weak these were, I was told that I didn't have a consensus the discussion was closed. But I've now got no less than 20 reliable sources for "evangelical" or secondarily "conservative Christian". Stay posted. BlueMesa171 (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)