User talk:Boyar~enwiki

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Grand master  ka  08:37, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Michael Clarke Duncan
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. SteveLamacq43 14:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edits
Hi, Boyar, you were probably trying to help, but keep in mind that Wikipedia is an emcyclopedia with some content policies. Be aware that content must be verifiable from a reliable source and must be written from a netural point of view. Also, be aware that speculation and unsourced analysis is original research, which we don't allow; instead we rely on what reliable sources have to say. Be aware of adding to excess detail and quotations to articles, as we try to avoid trivia, because Wikipedia is not an indiscrminate collection of information. I do appreciate that you wanted to add some information to the Red vs. Blue articles, but be aware of Wikipedia is looking for. Thanks. — TKD::Talk 06:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Beyond War?
Hi -

I went to do some cleanup on the articles Beyond War and Prince Jerrimer, but I could not find any independent references on the net to this novel. All links I can find are to the Wikipedia articles (and their clones on Wikipedia-derived sites). As far as I can tell it has not actually been published. Are you the author of the novel? Has the book been published, and if so can you add links to confirm that? Thanks! Tim Pierce 05:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Jaxsonjo 08:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Boyd Robertson
The article Boyd Robertson has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 04:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism on Donald Rumsfeld
This edit is unacceptable. If you cannot contribute constructively, do not contribute at all. Vandalism will not be tolerated.  auburn pilot  talk  15:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism on Kazakhstan
This edit is unacceptable. Please do not replace articles on Wikipedia with nonsense. Vandalism will not be tolerated. Pixuk 23:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

June 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Philip Trueman (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page University of Queensland has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 15:20, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Boyar. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Boyar~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 22:45, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)