User talk:Boyomac

June 2021
Hello, I'm Johnnie Bob. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Iyabo Ojo, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Johnnie Bob (talk) 18:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iyabo Ojo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drill it (talk) 18:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Please I made a citation but you deleted it.I don't understand you,be careful Boyomac (talk) 20:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Iyabo Ojo, you may be blocked from editing. Drill it (talk) 21:14, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You are the person enganing in disruptive activities because my contributions has source.And you may be block from editing because of your continues deletions without valid point. Boyomac (talk) 22:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * As long as you continue to add the same information, which is not supported by a WP:RELIABLE source, you are engaging in WP:DISRUPTIVE editing. The source you have cited is not reliable because it is a WP:TERTIARY source.  For a list of reliable sources for various African countries, including Nigeria, see WP:AFSL. — Johnnie Bob (talk) 00:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

That not true,my contributions source is valid, even then the previous contributions of other people... It seems you have special interest in this particular person, first you said I don't add Sources which was a mistake I did that Just that.You may be ban soon. Boyomac (talk) 12:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Drill it (talk) 12:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

You must discuss and gain consensus about your edits
Your recent editing history at Iyabo Ojo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Even if your edit is sourced, it has been contested by other editors for having undue weight and other issues. You must now discuss the edits at Talk:Iyabo Ojo to get consensus about whether the information should be in the article and how it should be written.'' —C.Fred (talk) 14:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)