User talk:Boz2478

Welcome!

Hello, Boz2478, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Andy Rash, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! → Σ  τ  c. 04:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Andy Rash


A tag has been placed on Andy Rash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. → Σ  τ  c. 04:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

I was unjustly blocked for something i did not do therefore i don't see why you should keep me blocked. I am NOT the same person as Aviationfrk9 which is what i was blocked for.
 * I really am not sure why boz2478 was blocked. He should be unblocked. We are not the same people. If you can see my IP address, then surely you will see that this is true. And besides, he's a new user, as am I (my account is almost a year old but I had only barely touched on trying to edit an article and forgot about the account since then [last May].) According to the rules, we should be given the benefit of the doubt considering that we, or at least boz2478, are still new to editing. On a side note, if you will take a look at my talk page, you will see some of my other messages to user Fuhghettaboutit. Maybe you can urge him to reply to me. Maybe he will take it into more consideration since you are an administrator, also. He won't reply to me after multiple attempts at contacting him. Apparently, he thinks that boz2478 and I are the scum of the earth because we created 2 new pages that nobody was ever going to look at, and he accused us both of vandalizing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aviationfrk9 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You are applying for a position as a writer and editor for the most widely-read encyclopedia on the planet. So far, you haven't shown any sign that you are even aware that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.  You haven't shown that you possess any of the skills needed for good research writing, or even that you are interested in doing that kind of writing.  No one has called you 'scum of the earth.'  But no one is going to unblock you if there's no sign that unblocking you is going to make the encyclopedia better.  Evidence suggests that you are either one person or two people in the same place whose main goal is amusing himself by screwing around on the internet.  That's a perfectly reasonable goal, but you don't need a Wikipedia account to accomplish it.  It's a big internet, with lots of amusing places to screw around.  Have you seen Failbook? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:16, 18 January 2012 (UTC)


 * OK, I'll concede. You have some very good points. As a trivial point, however, I never really said that he specifically called us "the scum of the earth", but he insinuated that we were by the tone that he had when he said things. It doesn't feel too great to be talked down to for something like that, which, to me, is quite trivial. I understand that you can't have any BS on here at all. I mean really, it is the most widely read encylopaedia in the entire world, but for something as little as this in a database of 4 million+ articles, it just seems to me to be a large waste of time. If you really would like us to get serious and actually improve Wikipedia, could you link us to the tutorials, if there are any, of how to get started on here? It would be greatly appreciated. Sorry for all the trouble that I, or boz2478, have caused. It truly was not in bad spirit or malice. Aviationfrk9 (talk) 01:48, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You will find the links you request at the top of this page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:52, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Your creation of User:FisherQueenIsGay is a clear demonstration that you do not have the necessary skills to edit Wikipedia at this time. Focus on your schooling, especially your research writing skills, and develop adult skills for communicating with others and coping with disagreements, and come back in a few years when you have developed the skills you need to be successful here. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:54, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

That wasn't me!