User talk:Bpassword

May 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wildthing61476 13:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Seanism aspects
I have added a "" template to the article Seanism aspects, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wildthing61476 14:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

The article Seanism aspects has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 14:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Seanism qualities, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Wildthing61476 15:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Soapboxing
Wikipedia is not a soapbox for you and your personal theories. Please find another outlet, such as a web site of your own, for publishing your theories. Since you appear to be here solely to mis-use Wikipedia for that purpose, rather than to write an encyclopaedia, and have continued to mis-use Wikipedia for that purpose after editors have directed you to our policies and guidelines I have revoked your editing privileges. Uncle G 16:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a soapbox