User talk:Bpayne4001

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest.

It was called a Bachelor of Laws degree, not Law.

April 2008
I have looked over some of your edits to the Western New England College article. There seems to be a pattern of removing information that may be factual but not flattering. I also understand that you are an employee of the article's subject. It is generally expected that contributors in this situation refrain from making edits themselves. Recusal is expected in order to avoid inherent conflicts of interest. This especially true when the employee is specifically charged with marketing. Please review Wikipedia Help before making further edits. I will be keeping track of your future edits. Thanks. --Hittoplot (talk) 19:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

May 2007
I reverted your edit to April 5. A new piece of building does not really compare to the independance of whole countries in terms of notability :D The page is about world events that influenced history. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Commonwealth Coast Conference
I'd like the my edit to that template, changing "Western New England" to "Western New England College" to be made. I work at Western New England College and we never refer to the College as Western New England. Please let me know your thoughts. 18:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Bpayne4001
 * Hey there. Thanks for the message. I understand your desire, but here's the issue: Wikipedia isn't for "official" terminology and propoganda, and more opposed to it than anything. The entire template uses shortened versions of names (Gordon for Gordon College, Eastern Nazarene for Eastern Nazarene College -- even though no one calls it Eastern Nazarene), and standardising coverage is something Wikipedia supports. Essentially, your desire to change a standardised template isn't enough to keep the edit. Your only other option would be to change all the names to full names, so that it's still standardised and you'll get your way with the full name ;-). Aepoutre (talk) 21:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Law 4 clr long.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Law 4 clr long.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alumni Healthful Living Center


The article Alumni Healthful Living Center has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Clearly fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 17:53, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Western New England University seal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Western New England University seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of George E. Trelease Memorial Baseball Park for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George E. Trelease Memorial Baseball Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/George E. Trelease Memorial Baseball Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)