User talk:Brackenheim/Archive 2

Community input required: lowering delist bar at FPC
You are receiving this because of your current or past association with the Featured Pictures project. Following on from several cases where closers did not observe the prescribed minimum votes required for a delisting, there is now a motion to entirely dismiss the requirement for a minimum. Please participate in the discussion as wide-ranging changes may arise. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 13:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Courtesy link: Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 15:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the information! It's a very long discussion... --Brackenheim (talk) 12:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo Ferrero kinder Schokolade.svg)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Ferrero kinder Schokolade.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Requests for page importation
Hello, thanks, those scripts sound nifty! I've added the first one to my monobook.js on the English Wikipedia. Re the second one, my screen reader already provides me that function (by telling me how many items are in each list. Graham 87 01:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

File renamed at Commons
Hello Brackenheim. Thanks for the renaming at Commmons .--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 21:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello Jetstreamer, you're welcome. No problem ;-) Regards, --Brackenheim (talk) 21:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

User:BrackiBot
Please submit a WP:BRFA if you want to run automated editing with your bot account. — xaosflux  Talk 15:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello Xaosflux, thank you for that notice. I'll request a botflag then. Kind regards, --Brackenheim (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 14 – 21 July 2018
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 15 – 21 August 2018
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 16 – 30 September 2018
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:57, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 20 – 31 January 2019
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 21 – 28 February 2019
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 23 – 30 April 2019
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 24 – 17 May 2019
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Brackenheim! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 16:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

edit war
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 16:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Really? Look, what I already tried: User_talk:ScienceFlyer. -- Brackenheim (talk) 16:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes really, if you are reverted you try to get consensus at the articles talk page.Slatersteven (talk) 16:37, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * So that I understand it correctly: I am writing / translating a text, backing it up with numerous sources and someone deletes this section without reference to any scientific sources. Then should I discuss to show that all of the studies linked in the text are correct? And whoever deleted the text just doesn't have to do that? -- Brackenheim (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * See WP:ONUS, it is on those who want to include something to make a case at talk.Slatersteven (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * And that means? Should I start a vote on the talk page of the article if the pathomechanism of the disease is allowed to be included in the article or not? -- Brackenheim (talk) 16:54, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Not as vote, but yes you should have started a discussion (hence why its Bold Revert Discus (wp:brd).Slatersteven (talk) 16:55, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Slatersteven is right. Follow BRD. The huge amount of content based on so few sources smacks of OR, so it should be removed and discussed thoroughly. It also gives undue weight to fringe opinions. -- Valjean (talk) 17:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, done. -- Brackenheim (talk) 22:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your behavior
I have commented at WP:ANEW about the dispute at Multiple chemical sensitivity. As you can see, I noted that you had violated WP:3RR on the article. However, because of the somewhat unusual circumstances, I protected the article and warned you. However, your report of the other user in the dispute,, at WP:AIV, which I declined, was incorrect and spiteful. If I see you do anything like this again, I will block you.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Fox Cub Bold - Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Fox Cub Bold - Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:In the Path of the Storm - Cover.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:In the Path of the Storm - Cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Battle for the Park - Cover.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Battle for the Park - Cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Siege of White Deer Park - Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Siege of White Deer Park - Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)