User talk:BradEkenberg

Speedy deletion nomination of Mikrotech
Hello BradEkenberg,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mikrotech for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hasan (talk) 15:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mikrotech


A tag has been placed on Mikrotech requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.mikrotech.com/capabilities/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. A S U K I T E 15:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Your edit to Mikrotech has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Copying from   Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 15:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * User:BradEkenberg/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:BradEkenberg Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pahunkat&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:BradEkenberg reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pahunkat (talk) 15:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mikrotech


A tag has been placed on Mikrotech requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:40, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Recreating Mikrotech
Hi, I see you've been recreating the above article. It was tagged again by somebody else for lack of a credible claim of significance (criterion A7). If it is repeatedly recreated again this could be viewed as disruptive, or it could be nominated for Articles for deletion which will establish a consensus that it does not belong. As a courtesy, I've reviewed the company for notability using WP:BEFORE as a standard, and have not found any suitable sources at Google, WP:RSSE, news, scholar, JSTOR, propublica, newspapers.com or elsewhere. Unless there's something I'm missing, the article likely does not belong and should not be recreated again. Hope this helps, and sorry for the inconvenience. A S U K I T E 15:51, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Blocked
I've indefinitely blocked you for promotion and copyright violations. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:25, 13 July 2021 (UTC)