User talk:BradGoakery

April 2024
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Federation of Australia, you may be blocked from editing. Graham87 (talk) 04:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @Graham87 Excuse me?!? I can see your point about the Federation of Alberta page, but Elections Alberta? Do you smoke Crack? Please explain to me how I added my personal opinion on that page. I'm waiting. BradGoakery (talk) 12:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Graham87 How did I add my personal opinion on the Elections Alberta page? Like I've stated, yeah, you do have a point and I accept the edit on the Federation of Australia, but you are on some hard core drugs buddy to think my edit on the Elections Alberta page was my personal opinion. Lmao. It doesn't matter. I'm not getting in a fight with you over a Wikipedia edit. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Wikipedia addict, so I'm not judging you for being passionate about it at all, it's your arrogance that is pissing me off. BradGoakery (talk) 12:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Graham87 I just want to take this opportunity to apologize to you regarding my behavior towards you. Regardless if I feel that I'm in the right, personal attacks are unacceptable and highly unnecessary. I can tell you are, and I read your page, passionate about Wikipedia as much as I am. In my opinion, anybody who shares my love and dedication to this website is a brother and family member to me, and we need to work together to help build and promote Wikipedia as a website that we want to see grow and thrive. We share the same goals. Losing your temper is sadly, apart of our daily human lives, but it's how we respond to it that shows who we really are, in my opinions. Again, I hope you can accept my apology. I'm not expecting you too, but for are shared passion for Wikipedia I am hoping you do. BradGoakery (talk) 15:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

We appreciate your grammatical fixes at articles such as Elections Alberta, but many of your edits have added your own opinion or changed sourced text without explanation. If you continue the latter editing pattern, you may be blocked. Graham87 (talk) 04:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Graham87 may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' user pages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on user page etiquette. Thank you. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using  in your reply. 13:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Additionally, please do not personally attack contributors, as you did here. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using  in your reply. 13:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ks0stm You know what, you are absolutely right. I do apologize for lashing out. Regardless of whoever is in the right or wrong in an argument, we are and should be a community brought together by are love of this website, and nobody should ever feel unsafe or unwelcome by anybody. BradGoakery (talk) 13:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ks0stm I have been in love with and frankly very addicted to the point it scares me to Wikipedia since I was a teenager in middle school lol. I don't go a day without visiting it. I want nothing more in the world for more people to become apart of this amazing community. Losing your cool, which is unfortunately apart of the human experience, won't help advance that cause. BradGoakery (talk) 13:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make inappropriate or abusive edit summaries or comments, as you did at The Addams Family. ''Your edit on that article calling out another editor's edit as "arrogance" was unacceptable. You might want to have a read through Wikipedia's civility policy.'' — AP 499D25  (talk)  14:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @AP 499D25 I'm fully aware and understand. I apologized and regret my actions. There will be no more trouble from me. BradGoakery (talk) 14:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Graham87 (talk) 17:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

I don't believe your above messages; anyone who edits the way you have is not suited to contributing here. Plus, you were unresponsive to messages here for over three weeks. You've already shown yourself to be capable of causing talk page disruption so I've blocked talk page access too. Graham87 (talk) 17:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)