User talk:Bradburyn

Business Process Management along with Enterprise Integration.

I have been monitoring the capability of several open source BPMN & BPMNS systems that allow a Business analsyt to define both the process and workflow elements with the ability to "hot" deploy the final result to a BPEL based engine that provides connectivity and scalability to backoffices systems such as CRM, SCM and other mainframe systems.

OpenSoft Australia has now taken on the initative to bring to the forefront and marketplace especially in Asia-Pacific with the continuing strength of Intalio Designer (version 5) and it's BPEL engine Intalio server.

It will provide working pre packaged systems that can be bundled as a Software-as-a-Service subscription model for almost any organisational need.

OpenSoft has developed several CRM, SCM interfaces with Intalio Designer and executing it against Intalio server and now integrates this along with both Liferay portal as well as Jboss Portal.

The beauty about this approach (which I admit is being adaopted by the likes of Spike source etc), is it supports many facets of a complete Enterprise and Integration stack under the provision of a monthly and yearly subscription basis.

Such platforms as operating system (windows 2003, linux redhat,suse,ubuntu), enterprise service busses (servicemix,mule, celtix) and application servers such as websphere community edition as well as jboss and the likes of other key software components like Jasper/Pentaho, Alfresco, Groundwork Monitor provide from an open source perspective a highly valued proposition to all technology market segments.

A tag has been placed on Groundwork opensource, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nancy Skittle 08:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

NSD
Hi there. Just a reminder that you should not remove the nomination for deletion notice from pages you have created youself as per the text of the notice. The fact that you have contested the deletion is enough to delay the decision although you will also need to explain why the page should remain on its Talk page. Hope this helps. Nancy Skittle 08:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)