User talk:BradenLG2000/sandbox

Yo

Peer Review
In Braden's edits the grammar,punctuation and structure of the additions are done well with no notable mistakes. there area also the correct number of citations. the additions fit very well with the already done paragraphs.Kyle.long098 (talk) 15:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC) (kyle long) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyle.long098 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

The opening three sentences make clear sense to me, but they may possibly be interpreted incorrectly. Try making it more clear that the "loop" with peers in digital and not physical. For the later sentences, provide some sort of example. Maybe describe an event in which one athlete was in hot water for his/her comments on social media. Otherwise, the statement seems unnecessary. (Peer Review By Caden Coleman) Colemancaden (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft Feedback
This is a good start, Braden. Your sources are good, too. You may find you need to add more explanation as you integrate it into the mainspace for your topic, though. JAirhart 20:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC) P.S. Kyle's comment about grammar is good, too. Take a look at revising. JAirhart 20:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airhartcomp (talk • contribs)