User talk:Bradinggs

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Wperdue (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Econoception
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Econoception, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Neologism. Only mention anywhere on google is the source listed here.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wperdue (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Econoception
I have nominated Econoception, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Econoception. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wperdue (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Your new word
Hi. You wrote "There is no other record of the use or source of the term on google that mentions "Econoception" and that was the only reason given to remove it." That was exactly the reason to remove it: the point is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, a tertiary source, and does not publish new things or original research - we would only have an article about a new term once it was widely used. See WP:NEO, in particular: "Articles on protologisms are usually deleted as these articles are often created in an attempt to use Wikipedia to increase usage of the term."

Even our sister project Wiktionary requires a term to be attested by, e.g. "Usage in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year", though they do maintain a list of protologisms, and you could try seeing whether you can get your new word in there - see here. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Econoception
A tag has been placed on Econoception requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)