User talk:Bradley0110/archive2

Your GA nomination of The Deal (2003 film)
The article The Deal (2003 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Deal (2003 film) for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Cirt (talk) 06:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

The Pilot
I don't have enough time to build a proper reception section, so what I'll do is find some articles with useful comments and e-mail them to you, then you can use them as you like. -- Scorpion 0422  23:30, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I found you a half dozen reviews and sent them to you. They are all from before the airdate of the pilot and most of them are negative about the show. I tried to find some 100% positive reviews, but there weren't any. Either way, I hope that helps. -- Scorpion 0422  00:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Wallander
I am the guy who has been contributing to the Wallander page with info from Swedish media. Mostly from my other computer where I don't have my screen name saved (yep, I have forgot my password). I just NOW realised you have leaft me a message on the talk page in October about the name "Povel Wallander". Well the actor in question was assigned to play "Wallander's father" and his dads name is Povel in the books. By the way, I really, really appreciate all your contributions and input on the Wallander page. I live in the US so I won't get to see the series untill this spring. (Unless my brother gan give the the DVD's, he works for the company who co-produced the Swedish language films, two of whom will be shown on BBC 4, and will distribute the BBC series in Scandinavia)

I have one question, the TV ratings, How good or bad would you rate them? I know nothing about UK tv ratings. VsanoJ (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Now I become uncertain. As I said it was over 10 years ago I read them. David Warner is listed as Povel Wallander on IMBD, but then maybe someone is basing this on MY Wiki entry here. I have to check with my father. If I somehow have “dreamed” up the name Povel, I apologize. I did not intend to cause any disinformation.


 * I really loved the Wallander books when I read them (even if I think Henning Mankell whole idea of “something is rotten in Sweden” is really exhadurated) and I am an enormous fan of British crime dramas, so I am really, really looking forward to the Wallander series. PBS broadcasts with very low image quality so a lot of the “marvels” of the Red One camera will most likely “fall flat” to American viewers. Due to this the UK or the Swedish DVD’s will be a must. On Amazon UK you can still find those books with "Branagh free" covers :-)

http://www.inspector-wallander.org/news/uk-tv-rotdm.html http://www.ystadsallehanda.se/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050604/NOJE/106030863/1011/KULTUR Ed Whitmore (Sea of Souls, He Kills Coppers) wrote the treatment for a proposed "The Return of the Dancing Master" TV film that never happened. At the time the rights for an English language Wallander films were locked up someplace else. Later when the Wallander rights reverted back to Mankell, the Ed Whitmore project was scrapped and the Wallander series as we know it materialized. Interesting side note is that the main character of "The Return of the Dancing Master", Stefan Lindman later moves to Ystad and joins Wallander's team in "Before the Frost". This character becomes Wallander's main crime solving partner in the Swedish language films and even dated Linda Wallander for a while before he meets his end. If BBC makes more Wallander films maybe Ed Whitmore scrip will come to use in some way. VsanoJ (talk) 21:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

I just saw this whole discussion about Wallander and if it is Swedish or British. I side with you....and I am Swedish ;-)

Re: Friends
Thanks, it means a lot. I'm hoping to get the article to GA status, so any input/thoughts would be appreciated. :) The whole process will probably take a while, but I may publish segments of what I have completed at small intervals. I will definitely contact User:CloudNine to see if he/she has anything, thanks for the reference. :D  Corn.u.co.pia /  Disc.us.sion  13:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't have the companion books, but I think there is enough info on the web to cover production (although I'm having trouble finding filming info, especially in regards to the apartments). Also, I am worried about what you noted. Even if I published my final copy, over time the article will probably be refilled with cruft. I guess I'll make sure to watch over it closely in the future. :S  Corn.u.co.pia /  Disc.us.sion  13:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That's a good idea, and please feel free to help out if you want. :)  Corn.u.co.pia /  Disc.us.sion  13:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. I'm going to bed now (it's 1 am where I live), so I'll talk to you soon. :D  Corn.u.co.pia /  Disc.us.sion  14:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Sounds great, and thanks for the advice. I tweaked the writing section a bit, but you're right, it needs more work. I'm not really sure if we're allowed to cite YouTube (copyright issues), but if we know the original source of that clip, we can cite it to that. I think it's from the sixth season DVD, though I'm not sure. I moved some of the writing info to "Remove?", which I have no problem removing. The information I have about "Pat the Cop" is not in the pilot article. If you want, remove if form my sandbox and add it to the Pilot article. The rest of the writing info seems better now, but tell me if you think it still requires further clean-up. Remember, please, please, please feel free to help and edit as you please. I appreciate the help. :)  Corn.u.co.pia /  Disc.us.sion  02:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, the good news is that I'm almost done. The only major thing left is sourcing the awards and ratings. The ratings are going to be hard to source properly, and the awards just as time-consuming. What do you think is the best way to go about both sections? Do you think the awards section is good as-is? I only listed the winners; mentioning the nominees would take a lot of space.  Corn.u.co.pia /  Disc.us.sion  13:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I've finished the awards section, the only thing left now is the ratings section. I've added some refs, but can't find any for the older seasons. Any ideas?  Corn.u.co.pia /  Disc.us.sion  07:04, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I got a bit excited and published all my progress on the main page. The only issue left is the ratings, which will hopefully get more attention now that it is on the mainspace. Thanks for your help! :)  Corn.u.co.pia /  Disc.us.sion  08:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks so much, it's nice to be acknowledged like that every now and again. :) Hopefully the transition does go smoothly, and a semi-protection isn't needed. I've nominated it for GA (which I guess you noticed), although I'm still a bit concerned about the ratings. Hopefully something will be done by the time of the review.  Corn.u.co.pia /  Disc.us.sion  13:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * If you are still looking for more specific ratings data, you might consider referencing the Friends episode list at TV Tango. I won't add it because of a conflict of interest. Doctor TV (talk) 09:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I'll rewrite the plot once I get back from my holiday (in around one week), and then I'll ask another editor to copyedit it again. FA reviewers are extremely tough on prose, and I don't think my writing is good enough. :P I suggest asking another editor to copyedit the entire article prior to nominating it. :)  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   05:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I have not seen the pilot for a long time, so I just tweak what was there. It's a bit shorter, but hopefully the prose quality has improved a bit. Your thoughts?  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   03:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey, don't know if you noticed, but Friends is finally a GA! :D How's the progress with the pilot going?  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   02:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Weird, I was thinking the exact same thing about the image just a couple of days ago. Maybe an image featuring all of them in either the coffee house or the apartment? I haven't really been that involved with the article, so I'll leave the nomination up to you.  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   02:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. The picture is quite good, but the Ross thing is really a shame. Do you know of any sites dedicated to Friends images?  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   03:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Argh, that's a shame. Some shows have fan sites with heaps of screenshots from each episode. I am a bit busy right now (with homework), so I'll talk to you later. :)  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   03:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Davey MRSA
I'm really impressed with what you've done with that article, and suggest that you take it to FAC soon. I think it's GA passable now, but before you take it to FAC, you should check out the Doctor Who production material available: Doctor Who Confidential at Christmas, The Next Doctor Podcast, and Doctor Who Magazine 403 (and most-likely, 404) will all have quite a bit of information about him. Sceptre (talk) 22:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: 39 Steps
Thanks, I was going to look at the lead. I was thinking about GA possibly at some point; do you think there is anything else needed prior to nomination? I'm also not sure whether to alter the article to define it as more of a feature-length drama rather than a film and using the TV infobox rather than the film one. What do you think? mattbr 17:11, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll change it. mattbr 17:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Wallander
Bradley, you've clearly done a lot of good work on this article, but I maintain that the title is very misleading. There are more than one "Wallander TV Series", and your title is therefore confusing. As to your injunction not to move an article without consensus -- I'm not sure where you get this from, but I was following the W. principle of being bold. And I can of course boldly move it back again, but perhaps if you understand my reasoning you'll make that choice yourself.

Bidmead (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate your guidance on page stats, take your point about the English version of W, and agree that subsequent body text edits help the disambiguation. But I still think your distinction between "TV Series" and "Film Series" is moot. Both the UK and the Swedish Wallander series were clearly budgeted on the basis of both TV and DVD sales, and I think both could equally be called (and -- more importantly, would be expected by readers to be called -- "TV series").

Reverting my retitling from "UK TV Series" suggests to me that you think "TV Series" is more helpful or less inaccurate in some way. Your note on this reversion says you've done this in the interest of consistency. Can you explain this? I don't see the value of this over the necessity (in this case) for disambiguation.

Bidmead (talk) 16:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I just saw this whole discussion about Wallander and if it is Swedish or British. I side with you....and I am Swedish ;-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by VsanoJ (talk • contribs) 16:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I agree, the whole "won't they/will they" section can go. I think the choices of books to be adopted are purely made on the basis that tey can sgoot in Ystad. The Dogs of Riga is in my opinion one of the strongest books and slso THE book that made Mankell into the house hold name he is in Sweden. The Man Who Smiled will allow for alot of filming around Southern Swedish country estates, something Left Bank seems to enjoy. What do you think? The choice of Hettie Macdonald to take on The Faceless Killers is interesting as it some how goes hand in hand with her film White Girl. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VsanoJ (talk • contribs) 14:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree with you about Faceless Killers. They should have done that book in series one, maybe as a 2 parter. That book pretty much sets the tone for the whole series of books and his relationship with Rydberg. I also agree with you about Linda. She comes of so wrong and the relationship between father and daughter comes across not any were near as fractured as it should be. My guess is that maybe they did not want the tone to be too dark?? Wallander is quite dark for being co-produced by PBS/WGBS Boston. I cannot help but wonder if they had a say in this or some kind of influence?? Over all they are doing an OK job compressing the stories into a 120 min format. The Swedish films directly based on the books are over way over 2 hours. I REALLY wonder what they will do if they get around to do a series 3?? Before The Frost changes the setting with Linda as a police officer and Pyramid is all short stories, that I guess they could tweak. The new Wallander book reportedly closes the door to any further books according to an interview Mankell did over the phone with Swedish pubcaster Svt. Yellowbird owns the rights to 24 Kurt Wallander story concepts that Mankell has written for them (Some good, some not so good), could be an option. I also think that Mankell could be motivated to write brand new teleplays. He wrote two some kind of special anniversary episodes for German cop show “Heimat” and has created and written some miniseries for Swedish television in the 90’s. In the interviews Mankell has done with Swedish media about the BBC series he has been VERY enthusiastic, and this is a man who mostly speaks very slowly and looks concerned. VsanoJ (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Here is something I wanted to run by you before I do anything. Various Swedish media outlets has recently reported that due to the Wallander series, Ystad has recieved a HUGE increase in tourists form the UK. I am not 100% that it belongs in this entry, but it is a kind of interesting. (Nor it is surprising, when the Wallander books started selling in Germany and later followed by the Swedish language films, Ystad, not exactly a tourism hot spot was flooded by Germans and one of the reasons WHY this production was able to get many tax cuts was that the Ystad city council and the tourism board there was hoping to replicate this phenomenon) VsanoJ (talk) 18:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I added a small section about the Wallander series inpact on Ystad and Skane tourism. I bet Wallander will take home the Emmy for best mini-series. I know I am partial since I really enjoyed this series, but since I am currently living in the US, I cannot imagine a mini-series that can compete. Mini-series seems to be a lost art in Hollywood. VsanoJ (talk) 19:37, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Wallander series 2
Ystad Allehanda had a big article today about Series 2. Feel free to edit it as much as you want. Have you heard who the other directors will be? I cannot find any info about this.VsanoJ (talk) 16:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

I am afraid I am not familiar with Aisling Walsh. I used to watch the Bill when it was on the air in Sweden in the 90’s and Trail & Tribulations sounds very familiar. I think they have been way a head on pre-production then they let anyone know. Splitting the series up sounds like a good idea. I agree that some US reviews should be included. It actually seems that Wallander got better reviews in the US then anywhere else. But then one needs to take into account that it was shown on PBS and not ABC or CBS.I hoping they might enlist a Scandinavian director. Jonas Gimas would be a good choice (he is based in London and has worked on the Swedish Wallander among other stuff) or Niels Arden Oplev who directed The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo movie and did some work on Danish cop show Unit One/ Rejseholdet, a show that has a similar visual style to BBC’s Wallander. But I know I am just being partial here.

What do you think about Yellowbird giving Stieg Larssons books a English language treatment? How are you enjoying The Pyramid? Have you read Mankell’s “Return of the Dance Master”? The book actually ties into the Wallander books. VsanoJ (talk) 19:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC))

The main character in The Return of the Dancing Master is Stefan Lindman, who is a supporting character in Before The Frost and becomes a main character in the first Yellowbord series of films. Stieg Larsson's books are very different from Mankell, though.

The Wallander series 1 page looks very good.VsanoJ (talk) 20:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Dexter
Hi, you responded to the Dexter PR, I've answered your concern, it would be great if you could have another look. Thanks already. -- Music 26/  11  22:17, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi again, cornucopia has added some more image possibilities to the PR, could you take another look, please. Thank you.-- Music 26/  11  12:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CSI season 1 cast.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:CSI season 1 cast.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: David Mitchell
Whatever you say, I've just never seen them included in any article before, that's all. Gran2 17:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Brad, do you know your way around WP:PUNC? If so, could you perhaps check through Phil Hartman? That would really help out a lot. Thanks. Gran2 21:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Cheers! Gran2 22:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Gene Hunt
Thanks, I should have spotted they were inappropriate - I didn't intend to endorse them, I was just tidying up the previous editor's unhelpful revert of the entirety of your previous copyedit, just to bring the links back. --McGeddon (talk) 12:41, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Brad Pitt
It might be long, but a good example would be Heath Ledger's filmography, which is really long. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know you were just giving your thoughts on it, but it doesn't really compare, as say as Christopher Walken or Dan Castellaneta. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Cat: Notable Eyebrows
He's not the only one, you know. Stewart Lee; look at the infobox pic. I'm sure he needed training to do that. Ceoil (talk) 20:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Har. I'm going to assume your from NI with this one from eyebrowyproductions. Ceoil (talk) 20:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Its fustrating I know to get pulled up on images; I do music articles and we have the same problem with sound files, can only use a few. But the policy is as it is, and here we are. I'd say stike your reply to F-Nua, engage him/her and see what happens. Its not the major selling part of the article anyway. Ceoil (talk) 21:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Just let it. An oppose which has not been revisited but which is no longer valid is not usually taken into account. Ceoil (talk) 21:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Problems on the FAC. Christ; dont respond, it might be wiser to sit it out and wait for an other openion. Does not seem to be a reasonable person here yet, fine, lets see. Ceoil (talk) 17:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Damned United


Now I don't have a scanner at home so I'll see what if I can arrange to use one tomorrow. However, if you want, would you rather I implement the info or just leave it to you with your presumably greater knowledge of the film? Alientraveller (talk) 15:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well I tried to implement as much as possible, but I just wasn't too sure whether I was reading anything relevant. I will scan it for you to decide tomorrow, I promise. Alientraveller (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I scanned them, how would I attach them then? Alientraveller (talk) 11:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Bones.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Bones.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

List of QI episodes FLC
Hi there,

I wish to ask you, seeing as how you have been commenting on the List of QI episodes FLC, I was wondering if would now please either state if you now support or oppose the promotion to FL. So far, only one user has given their support/opposition rather than just commented, and it is getting close to the 10 days before the article is reviewed. I would really appreciate it. ISD (talk) 07:56, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the link work at Bart Sells His Soul. Cirt (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

RE:File:Laurie-McInnernyBlackadder4.jpg
Yes, I was afraid of that. After I uploaded the image I realized that it wasn't really necessary and could easily be replaced with a free image. Thanks for removing it.-- Music 26/  11  10:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Bathurst pic
Any particular reason why Bathurst doesn't want his picture on Wikipedia? It's accurate, it's non-defamatory, it's visually quite appealing... &mdash; Wereon (talk) 19:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Kingdom
Thanks for your message. I must admit to not having the same concerns, and so long as its properly sourced (which it is), then it has a place within the article - even if it could be found elsewhere. The main article will be people's first point of call after all. Regards. Discobadgers (talk) 12:20, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Indeed! I suspect however that getting all of that info would cost quite a pretty penny. Overnights, share and officials will all be freely available though - the Primeval page is a good example of how that can be structured. (talk) 08:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Friends guest stars
Thanks for the note. :) I probably should've waited for full consensus, but that article was so useless, unsourced, and unnotable that I felt it had to go. Any other news on the Friends front??  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   05:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I really like your version of the article. Hopefully you can implement it soon?  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   06:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Very good! I guess the article's almost done. Anyways, if you're referring to the e.g. ""The One with the Pediatrician" (Season 9, 2002)" as the rubbish, we could fix them up using Template:Cite episode. That can be done later and I'd be willing to do some of it. However, if you want to do it now, I could get started straight away. :)  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   00:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, lol, okay. Do you want to split the work 50/50? It shouldn't really take too long anyways.  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   07:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks good. To even things out I'll do seasons 5-10.  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   08:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, feel free to continue. I'm a bit busy right now so I think I'll wait for you. ;)  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   08:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh. No. You. Didn't. I'm a Federer fan, but I guess it's obvious who's gonna win so why even bother arguing about it? lol. I'll start formatting them now.  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   13:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I couldn't find anything other than the source articles. Usually I'm able to fluke it and find copied versions of the article on other sites, but I guess these ones have been well kept. I guess you can ask the wider community at the TV WikiProject, because I think several people will be able to help you. Speaking of Friends, I'll start formatting the ref while watching the tennis. Do you plan on continuing formatting the episodes like we have, or should be switch to what I used here (just check the episode refs}? With the full use we can even remove the specific episodes from the descriptions, unless you specifically want to keep them.  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   12:56, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh no you didn't. I'm a Federer fan, but I guess it's obvious who's gonna win so why even bother arguing about it? lol. I'll start formatting them now.  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   13:14, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Blood Ties (Homicide: Life on the Street)
Thanks for your kind words! I'm currently working on Subway (Homicide: Life on the Street), which still needs some grammatical tweaks, and then I have plans for more Homicide articles in the future... —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  20:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)