User talk:Bradshaws1

Please create any new sections at the bottom of the page. --Bradshaws1 (talk)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Video Collection.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:The Video Collection.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:21, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Video Collection International logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Video Collection International logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Strand Home Video logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Strand Home Video logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Moviestorm Article
I would like you to help me write the article...Im not really fond on how to write in Wiki So please excuse me. And sorry for the super late reply, if you are still interested please contact me. Forbiden1 (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Video Collection International logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Video Collection International logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:01, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Video Collection logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:The Video Collection logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Reply!
 Theopolisme TALK 03:50, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you still interested? Dan653 (talk) 22:36, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not quite sure [[Image:Confused.png|16px]] Are there any other ideas I might want to consider? --Bradshaws1 (talk) 23:44, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Not really, you can either learn how to NPP or CVUA or both, what else are you thinking of? Dan653 (talk) 00:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

CVUA
Hey there! I just saw your request on CVUA, would you like to enrol?--Chip123456 16:38, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the CVUA!
Hello Bradshaws1! I'm Vertium (Steve) and I've been asked to mentor you as part of the Academy. It's great to have you on board! First, as I'm sure you are aware, vandalism is an everyday occurrence in Wikipedia, and we need to know how we deal with it correctly. We use The Four Steps of counter vandalism and those are:
 * Identify it;
 * Remove/revert it;
 * Warn the user; and if they persist,
 * Report to WP:AIV.

I would suggest going through the links and, if you haven't recently read it, have a good look at WP:VAND. We can have a chat about the tools you plan to use (manual, Twinkle, STiki, etc.) and then get started.

I've created a page just for you as we go through this process. I'll lay out the various steps involved with CVUA and help you in any way I can. I recognize that some people can spend different amounts of time on Wikipedia each day, so depending on your schedule, the Academy generally lasts 5-10 days from beginning to graduation.

The most important thing is that you ask any questions you have and that we stay in touch as you go through the academy. I look forward to working with you! Vertium '' When all is said and done 14:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

CVUA Page update
I've moved your question from my talk page to your CVUA page and provided a response. Please provide me the answers to the questions I asked on this page. Thanks! Vertium '' When all is said and done 02:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations

 * I've looked at your contributions and you're doing great. If you wish to apply for rollbacker rights, feel free to mention me as your CVUA mentor and reference.  Once you're a rollbacker, you can download STiki or Huggle and it automates the review process so you'll be able to find stuff much easier than simply looking at Recent Changes.   Please feel free to keep in touch if there's anything I can do to help.  All the best!  Vertium '' When all is said and done 03:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

RE: (Edward Cullen) Edit
Hey, is is VmpireProject23 and I am only stopping by and saying, that thanks for the heads-up on the edit thing. Plus you have got all rights to edit on what ever you see as not relevent to the information box. VampireProject23 (talk)
 * Thank you. --Bradshaws1 (talk) 00:51, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Permissions
Your request for rollbacker  has  been approved. Good luck with  counter-vandalism! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, thank you! --Bradshaws1 (talk) 13:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Subpage
Hi, are you aware that another editor created this subpage? If you would like for it to be deleted, please either request it via speedy delete or you can leave a note here, and I will delete it for you.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Speaking of which, you might like to know about this. AutomaticStrikeout 01:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks, I meant to look at Dogman's edits since my final warning.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Congrats on receiving Rollback Perms
Hi, just wanted to drop you a note and congratulate on getting the Rollback rights. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help as you continue in the battle against vandalism. All the best... Vertium '' When all is said and done 15:50, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --Bradshaws1 (talk) 17:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Te Kooti page
Hello I dont think we have met before. You left an unfriendly message re my TK edits which I believe was wrong in fact.I cant really see how a detailed, accurate, well sourced and referenced edit from by far the best source on this topic can be"disruptive". Please note that the original source of much of the information was TK himself. This gives a new meaning to the word disruptive! I have asked editor Gadfium to have a look as he has some interest in Nz history. Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.62.226.243 (talk) 01:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Bradshaws1, it's your choice, naturally, but FYI you may be wasting your time presenting the New Zealand IP editor with selected excerpts from Wikipedia policies on reliable sources. That person has a very long history of denigration of respected historians, cherry-picking of sources to present their own (usually negative) views of Maori in NZ history and blatant original research to present quite novel and entirely fictional theories as fact. Despite his/her pretensions to "writing a paper" and hob-nobbing with historians, he/she has little to offer Wikipedia, either with expertise or writing ability, and is simply a general nuisance and an obstruction to article improvement. You can see from the user's talk page, and admin noticeboards, that many other editors have tried to help, but given up. My last suggestions on the Te Kooti talk page were ignored. On each occasion he/she has been blocked there has been no improvement in attitude. BlackCab (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

lojban
"native language" is "verclibau", so "verclibaucme" or "verclibau cmene" should work. Of course, da poi prenu cu se verclibau reda... phma (talk) 04:12, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Conservative (language)
Hello, Bradshaws1. You recently edited Conservative (language), suggesting "the vernacular speech of capital cities tends to be less conservative". You did not, however, cite a source for this suggestion. I have been a linguist for going-on-twenty years, and I have never seen such a suggestion in print. I have therefore removed the sentence. If you know of reliable sources verifying this observation, you may want to cite them. If the observation is based on your own experience of cities, it's probably best to leave it out. Happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 02:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I read it somewhere, don't know where. --Bradshaws1 (talk) 19:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I think I read it here. --Bradshaws1 (talk) 19:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Hm. Zompist.com is, I think, sometimes used as a source for articles about constructed languages, but that lone sentence doesn't strike me as a reliable description of natural languages. It may reflect research (though it doesn't cite any), but it might also come from Mark Rosenfelder's subjective impressions. I couldn't find any discussion in Wikipedia help pages of zompist.com as a source, but I see it appears fairly often in WP:WPSPAM archives, usually not as link spam in its own regard but alongside other pages that are judged to be spam. Cnilep (talk) 01:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mr Smith sja 2.png
Thanks for uploading File:Mr Smith sja 2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)