User talk:Bradwing12

Beleven Urthadar
A template has been added to the article Beleven Urthadar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Slp1 03:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Bradwing12,

I am just writing to you about your article Beleven Urthadar. You are probably not aware that Wikipedia has rules about what should be in the encyclopedia, but it does, and sadly I am not sure that the article meets the criteria. For example, articles need to be about notable subjects, things that someone else would want to look up in an encyclopedia. You are obviously very talented, with a great imagination, but you admit that you have just made him up and that Beleven Urthadar doesn't yet appear in a book. As a result your character doesn't yet seem be notable in the way that Wikipedia requires (though I am sure he will be when you publish your book!). Articles here also need to be verifiable, not original research and not something that you have made up yourself. Check out the links to help understand what I am saying. I am hoping that once you look into them you will agree that Wikipedia isn't the spot for your article at the moment. If you do agree, you can move the article to myspace or another website, and request that the article on WP is deleted, by adding to the top of the article. I feel this would be the best course, as otherwise the article will need to go through a discussion process called Articles for Deletion, which I personally think can be a bit upsetting when one has put a lot of work into an article (I would like to spare you this!). I will be watching these pages and would be happy to answer any questions that you have. Just to let you know that I will set the AFD process in motion in a day or so if I haven't heard from you. Good luck with your book! --Slp1 18:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Beleven.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Beleven.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)