User talk:Brady.Williamss/Eastern Yugur Language

Starting Assignment
Hi Brady, it looks like you've opted to do the exact same language as Anita Lu, but you never reserved the language (and it looks like you haven't done much to improve the bibliography as well). I said that if you picked a resource with some bibliographic references already, it would mean less work for you, but in this case it's hard for me to tell what value you're adding to this article (beyond one edit). Since you haven't done much for this assignment beyond 20 minutes of cut and paste work with one minor edit on the due date, I would recommend redoing it with another language that hasn't already been claimed by another student. Chuck Haberl (talk) 00:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Final Review
Hi Brady, well, it looks like you didn't take my advice on finding a different language to review. This is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
 * 2) Structure: The article is completely disorganized without any attempt at structure (save for the headings inherited from the original stub). It's basically just a wall of text, and not easily scanned for information. 1 point.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: You've made a good faith effort to support all of your information with references to the scholarly literature. 5 points.
 * 5) Relevance: Not all of the information is relevant to the subject (the stuff about sky burials, Classical Arabic, etc). 1 point.
 * 6) Length: Word count 1539/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 4 points.

The final score is 21/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 21:41, 12 May 2021 (UTC)