User talk:Bradyjack


 * } NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 07:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Risk Inclination Model, Bradyjack!

Wikipedia editor Jackson Peebles just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for the article! You might consider changing the CW, RC, and RIF sections to headings (Level 2 or 3) and adding some page categories. I am going to watch this page and try to improve upon it myself if you'd rather not.  Great job!"

To reply, leave a comment on Jackson Peebles's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.
 * Sure, check out the Risk Inclination Model page now, and note what I did with the headings. Most major articles are formatted like this.  --Jackson Peebles (talk) 23:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Risk inclination formula for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Risk inclination formula is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Risk inclination formula until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)