User talk:Braganza/Archive 2

1993 Narva and Sillamäe autonomy referendum moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 1993 Narva and Sillamäe autonomy referendum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:15, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

1991 Gagauz independence referendum moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 1991 Gagauz independence referendum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Opinion polling for the 2020 Taiwan general election moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Opinion polling for the 2020 Taiwan general election, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John from Idegon (talk) 07:32, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Opinion polling for the 2020 Taiwan general election (June 21) ==  Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Opinion_polling_for_the_2020_Taiwan_general_election Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by John from Idegon was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This virtually unsourced list of poll results is outside the scope of an encyclopedia. See WP:NOT

John from Idegon (talk) 23:59, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bierlein government, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabinet ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bierlein_government check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bierlein_government?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Modern display of the Confederate battle flag
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.carolana.com/NC/ncstateflag.html, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:58, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve 2019 European Parliament election in Aosta Valley
Hello, Braganza,

Thanks for creating 2019 European Parliament election in Aosta Valley! I edit here too, under the username QueerEcofeminist and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 16:59, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Our Land (Ukraine), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Our_Land_%28Ukraine%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Our_Land_%28Ukraine%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Der Wandel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ORF ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Der_Wandel check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Der_Wandel?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Kulanu
If you have an actual reliable source, please feel free to submit it. Otherwise, I just can't take your word for it. El_C 15:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Confederation Freedom and Independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MDR ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Confederation_Freedom_and_Independence check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Confederation_Freedom_and_Independence?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Swiss election results
Can you provide a source for these figures? Cheers, Number   5  7  22:13, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Majority
As per reliable sources, majorities in the UK are calculated under this system. Other, different calculation systems may be more common in other countries, maybe because those favor more the margin above the majority threshold rather than a working majority, I don't know. That different countries favour different systems to calculate the majority margin does not does not mean it is wrong. Impru 20 talk 13:39, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

and why are the majorities calculating SF and the speakers?
 * Focaldata: 364-(189+52+23+10+1+7 (SF)+4 (Speaker)) = 78
 * Electoral Calculus: 363-(186+48+31+9+3+1+1+1+7 (SF)) = 76
 * Election Maps UK: 378-(172+50+28+9+3+1+1+1+7 (SF)) = 106

my calculation was originally based on: Con-(650-SF-Speakers)/2

Braganza (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:1993 Narva and Sillamäe autonomy referendum concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1993 Narva and Sillamäe autonomy referendum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:1991 Gagauz independence referendum concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1991 Gagauz independence referendum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Social Democratic Group
Hello, Braganza,

Thank you for creating The Social Democratic Group.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Thank you for this new article, but it is merely a shell right now. Much more material is needed from any coverage this group may have received in reliable media, including their history, legislative achievements, and the like."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 21:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum (November 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:1992_Macedonian_Albanian_autonomy_referendum Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Primefac&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:1992_Macedonian_Albanian_autonomy_referendum reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 17:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Table source
Thanks for adding the last Belarus election results in the table! Could you modify the source at the bottom so that it lead directly to the page which contain them, though? As it is it lead to the frontpage, and the language barrier make it hard to look it up.--Aréat (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks!--Aréat (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1993 Narva and Sillamäe autonomy referendum


Hello, Braganza. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1993 Narva and Sillamäe autonomy referendum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1991 Gagauz independence referendum


Hello, Braganza. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1991 Gagauz independence referendum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Sources must be verifiable, a translation of something unidentified isn't verifiable
I refer of course to your edit at Longevity myths. Doug Weller talk 07:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Justice (Armenia) ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Justice_%28Armenia%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Justice_%28Armenia%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Catch-all
 * People's Coalition 5 Plus ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/People%27s_Coalition_5_Plus check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/People%27s_Coalition_5_Plus?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Catch-all

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Changes on 'Opinion polling for the 2024 Belgian federal election' page
Hi Braganza. You made some changes on the Opinion polling for the 2024 Belgian federal election page. You changed the current government to the minority government (Wilmès II) + support of other parties (which are not a part of the government). Imo, this is not correct! The composition of the current government is MR, Open VLD and CD&V, no others. Also see this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilmès_II_Government The parties supporting the government are only doing this for a very short period, just to beat the corona crisis, and are not part of the government. I think it's best to revert your changes, so the numbers reflect the composition of the minority government (MR, Open VLD and CD&V), as it was before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EotT123 (talk • contribs) 13:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * But it also makes little sense to compare a kind of "rump government", that at no point (since Dec. 2018) had an approximate majority, with the opposition Braganza (talk)


 * This makes perfectly sense, cause this is what the page is about. There is no majority government, which doesn't mean that you have to create an artificial one. You just have to let the numbers reflect the current state, even if there is no majority. That's just the state of Belgium today: since the fall of the government in december 2018, we don't have a real government (with a majority) anymore. Period. No need to say something else or change the numbers because that doesn't make sense. EotT123 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:09, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

In fact, this government-opposition comparison serves to compare whether the current government can continue to exist and not whether a minority government exists because of a government crisis Braganza (talk) 09:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

--

You could have added a new (temporary?) column to include this information. The support of the other parties of the opposition might not last long, as it is already crumbling. We don't have the same view on this, so I leave this for now. I'll wait until we are in one of the following situations: EotT123 18:56, 02 May 2020 (UTC)
 * A new government (with a majority) is formed. In this case, the numbers should be changed to reflect the new combination of parties in the government.
 * The minority government loses the support of the other parties, and we're back to the previous situation. In this case, the numbers should be changed to the previous state again.
 * New elections. In this case, the numbers should also be changed to the previous state again.
 * I would wait to we could use for this time period. Braganza (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Warning
Hi, I see you've recently edited a fair share of categories. I do not know how you reached that information or even what you think it qualifies as "catholic political party", but please refrain from categorising labels en masse without references to reliable secondary sources and even a mention in the body of the respective articles. Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 08:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * "francoism is a type of falganism" what does that even mean? If you mean "Francoism is a type of falangism", 1) broadly constructed: no 2) that is unconsequential to your edit. We don't edit by degrees of separation of free association of ideas--Asqueladd (talk) 09:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If it says that the party is neo-fracoistic, it is very relevant; After all, "Fracoistic" Spain was ruled by the "Falange Española Tradicionalista y de las Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional Sindicalista" Braganza (talk) 09:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) Look, mate. Label on the basis of what sources state. It's very simple. If the party is labelled as "neofrancoist"... then label it as such on the basis of that label (instead of drawing mildly reasonable and/or outright nonsensical original research from that fact). And so on. We don't have currently that label. We have "far right political parties" which comes it handy because the party is also sourced as such. What problem do you have with that procedure?--Asqueladd (talk) 09:19, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Spain was not ruled by the "Falange Española Tradicionalista y de las Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional Sindicalista (and even then the notion of an encompassing dominant ideology called falangism covering both FE de las JONS and that organization is somewhat troubling), Spain was ruled by Franco. That you apparently think Franco was a "falangist", that his dictatorship is deemed "falangist" or that "Francoism is a subtype of Falangism" are your personal opinions (not particularly informed ones).--Asqueladd (talk) 09:24, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * All in all, if I get you right, the reasoning that follows the "this is neofrancoist", so it is "francoist", so it is "falangist", so it is a "catholic political party" is bluntly speaking idiotic (no less because the relation of (original) falangism with the Catholic church is more nuanced than the case of francoism). Spanish Alternative may be a Catholic political party (it has been described as in "linked up with the "Catholic-fundamentalist spectrum" per ), but even then you need a source explicitly addressing that issue. That is not the case with most of the rest of categorizations made by you in any case.--Asqueladd (talk) 09:43, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Then please delete "Under the leadership of Francisco Franco, it largely became an authoritarian, conservative ideology connected with Francoist Spain." (and all other sentences about Franco's opinions like Visigoths) and "Falangism places a strong emphasis on Catholic religious identity, though it has held some secular views on the Church's direct influence in society as it believed that the state should have the supreme authority over the nation.; It was less concerned about biological Spanish racial regeneration than it was in advocating the necessity of Spanish Catholic spiritual regeneration.; Primo de Rivera saw the solution to the Jewish problem in Spain as simple: the conversion of Jews to Catholicism." from the article on Falangism and Francoist Spain on their template. Braganza (talk) 09:57, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a reliable source. And indeed, I've already asked for quite a lot of "citation needed" (and the likes) templates in that article (which seems to mix concepts of political culture, political movement and ideology). A crappy one created by a LTA.--Asqueladd (talk) 10:05, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Please stop. If you continue this edit pattern, I will report you to ANI.--Asqueladd (talk) 10:10, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Please, for the umpteenth time. Vis-à-vis the categorisation of article of political parties, use the labels used in reliable secondary sources addressing the concerned parties. Insofar you don't bring a source labelling 'X' as "Catholic political party", do not categorise the article of 'X' as such (other labels apply similarly). Is it difficult to understand? If you do not do this nor try to find consensus in the respective talk page, I will report you as a disruptive case of WP:IDONTHEARYOU, the pushing of original research and Edit warring. Do you get it?--Asqueladd (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

How about a third opinion Braganza (talk) 10:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * About what exactly?.--Asqueladd (talk) 05:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum. Thanks!  DGG ( talk ) 05:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Opinion polling for the next Croatian parliamentary election‎
Hi, why have you made changes to this article when the elections are tomorrow and the poll was already added? --Tuvixer (talk) 15:38, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * how did you calculate the values in the graph? Braganza (talk) 16:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * They published also the percentages of parties for each electoral district. --Tuvixer (talk) 18:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Original research
I have removed the alleged Turkish party affiliations you added last year from the articles on political parties in Northern Cyprus, such as Republican Turkish Party. By law in Northern Cyprus, there can be no ties between Turkish and Turkish Cypriot parties, and the policies of those parties you linked don't even match up, so this is entirely false original research. That's in contravention of a core policy, so please refrain from such activity in the future (and do let me know if you've had similar additions re. Cyprus/Turkey so I can have a look). Best wishes. --GGT (talk) 21:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

RAE
Please note that disambiguation pages like RAE are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:


 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
 * Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 13:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Category African-American men
Category:African-American men is a so-called container category. That means it should never have an article in it, only subcategories. Vexations (talk) 18:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum


Hello, Braganza. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1992 Macedonian Albanian autonomy referendum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Likud
Hi

He have left after the dissolution and there are others Likud MK who joined New Hope. --Panam2014 (talk) 17:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure, because she was never member of Likud (she was the one from Kulanu)? Braganza (talk) 18:19, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * She was sitting with Likud (the 36 Likud MK, 35 are Likud members, and 1 from Kulanu). --Panam2014 (talk) 19:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I know that but she could legally found a seperate Kulanu faction (See Gescher, jewish Home, ahi) Braganza (talk) 19:43, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * She does not do that. Also before the dissolution, Likud is shown that he have 36 MK not 35. --Panam2014 (talk) 00:18, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Results table format
In case you're wondering why it wouldn't work, the issue was the interwiki links. The module uses the name/link in the party field to search for a meta colour template. If the link in the party field is an interwiki, it causes the module to fall over. You can fix this by manually inserting a colour to the relevant row using  or   and this will stop the module searching for a meta template. I fixed it in this edit. Cheers, Number   5  7  23:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Israeli election results
Just wondered where you are getting the figures from. The figure you added to Meretz (202,189) is not the latest from the CEC (202,218). Number   5  7  15:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok we must update the results on 2021 Israeli legislative election Braganza (talk) 15:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes; can you correct the results on the party articles you edited before I mentioned this? Cheers, Number   5  7  16:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Armenian parliamentary election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Armenia
Seats are allocated using the d'Hondt method with an election threshold of 5% for parties and 7% for multi-party alliances.[3][4] However, a minimum of three political groups will enter parliament, regardless of the performance of the third-best performing party or alliance. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * ik but the undecided voters dontcount so every party has, instead of "x"%, "x/(100-27.4)"% so BHK has 5.096418732% Braganza (talk) 14:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Could you add the others polls to the graph?--Panam2014 (talk) 15:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * OK Braganza (talk) 16:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lithuanian Regions Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Jingiby. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Assembly of North Macedonia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 08:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Assembly of North Macedonia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 08:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * there are more (international) sources with the same information Braganza (talk) 09:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, Braganza. I found it also in Bulgarian . However for now this is only a claim at the Facebook status of Mickovski. Lets wait to see what is going to happen during the next week in the real politics in NM. Jingiby (talk) 09:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello again. According to the Facebook status of Ali Ahmeti in the news, he claims that he controls the political situation and there is no split in the ruling coalition. So let's wait until the political situation is going clearer in the next week. Greetings. Jingiby (talk) 09:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Parallel vote tabulation into Quick count. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: December 2021 Christian Democratic Union of Germany leadership election has been accepted
 December 2021 Christian Democratic Union of Germany leadership election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=December_2021_Christian_Democratic_Union_of_Germany_leadership_election help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 15:14, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IndependenceofAlberta.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IndependenceofAlberta.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

2008 Belarusian parliamentary election
Hello. Do you remember where you got these figures that you added to the article? The CEC source that you cited has no party affiliations.

There are also several oddities with the figures. Firstly, the total number of votes in the table is 5,498,646, which is 113,999 higher than the stated (and actual figure) of 5,384,647 – as 113,999 is the number of invalid votes, it looks like you have included the invalid votes somewhere in the party totals? Also, I reviewed the CEC source, and the total of 'against all', the total is 513,008, not the 505,208 that was added in that series of edits. Cheers, Number   5  7  16:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * To be honest i used the russian wiki but there was a list of candidates per party, i will check the data in the next days Braganza (talk) 16:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * OK cool, thanks. Number   5  7  16:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Short update ; CPB, BAP, LDPB, PCB, BSDH, RPTS & BNF are correct so far, BSDP (H) is actually even higher (by 41,630 votes) cause their number doesn't include those who were labelled "БСДП(Г)" but i still didn't found the real mistake, i have still some trouble with "Against all", Invalid and UCG Braganza (talk) 22:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Regarding the 'against all', there are some constituencies with two 'against all' figures. For example, constituency 17 had two candidates, but one dropped out. In the early voting there were 32 'against all' votes, while after they dropped out there were 9,313 'against' votes for the single candidate. Same thing in constituency 53 – 491 against all, 5,626 against single candidate.
 * In total, there were 1,509 votes cast for four candidates that withdrew.
 * If it's any help, here is the raw data from the CEC pdf – some constituency headings are missing due to the way the data converted from pdf to excel, but 'Electorate' is the first data row for the constituency, so if there isn't a constituency name directly above that, then it's missing. Number   5  7  22:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @Number 57; i found my mistake on the invalid votes the 113,999 number is correct (excluding withdrawn candidates; i accidentally added the last 3 or so twice), also your number on the "against all" is correct too
 * after doublechecking UCG should have 131,931 votes (6,655 more, so our russian colleague oversaw their "first" candidate) & BSDP (A) 59,010
 * assuming the number for total votes said by Nohlen is correct the independents should have 4,035,567 votes (Nohlen had the invalid votes correct, so their number should be reliable) Braganza (talk) 08:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Povežimo Slovenijo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Povežimo Slovenijo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political parties in Latvia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Democratic Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tagesschau.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi can you look my small error?
I added last poll but the poll page iserror page and i cant fix it can you look it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_Dutch_general_election#Seats Shadow4dark (talk) 23:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)


 * if you reload the link,it works Braganza (talk) 05:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liberalism and radicalism in Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hristo Ivanov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

1975 Ålandic legislative election moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 1975 Ålandic legislative election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1975 Ålandic legislative election has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 1975 Ålandic legislative election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=1975_%C3%85landic_legislative_election help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Curbon7 (talk) 15:44, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liberalism in Slovakia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democratic Union.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Les Engagés (political party) into Humanist Democratic Centre. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Together source
Hi, sorry to bother you but I can't find any source confirming that Together will run in the Action - Italia Viva joint list. Since you added it to the 2022 Italian general election page on 21 August, would you like to share the source with me since I can't find it anywhere? Thank you very much and have a good day Broncoviz (talk) 18:52, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * i think you can remove it, they were negotiations but im not sure how they ended Braganza (talk) 19:53, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

2022 Italian general election in Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2022 Italian general election in Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:58, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Italian general election in Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol (September 5) == <div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Goldsztajn was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2022 Italian general election in Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:2022_Italian_general_election_in_Trentino-Alto_Adige/S%C3%BCdtirol Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Goldsztajn&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:2022_Italian_general_election_in_Trentino-Alto_Adige/S%C3%BCdtirol reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Goldsztajn (talk) 11:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

FYI
<span style="color: snow; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(DarkGreen, Green, DarkOliveGreen, ForestGreen, SeaGreen)">PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:39, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Italian general election in Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 2022 Italian general election in Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=2022_Italian_general_election_in_Trentino-Alto_Adige/S%C3%BCdtirol help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Goldsztajn (talk) 10:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electoral threshold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power index.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Free-minded Party & Freeminded People's Party merge
Hello! I noticed that you recommended that these articles be merged. It looks like you've combined some of the material already. Did you complete the merge of the information? I'm not objecting--I'm just trying to see where we are in the merging process. Joyous! | Talk 02:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * the two articles listed were already there from the beginning Braganza (talk) 06:29, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Ah. Totally misinterpreted what I was looking at. Let's start over....

WHY YES, I think merging those two is a great idea! Joyous! | Talk 20:27, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Venstre (Denmark), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tagesschau.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Lazio regional election (February 9)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Lazio regional election and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:2023_Lazio_regional_election Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:2023_Lazio_regional_election reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Party links
Hello Braganza. I regularly see you make edits link this where you link a party to a party with a different name. In most cases, the article being linked to gives no impression that the party is the one that contested the election the link is being added from. What evidence do you have that the Croatian Republican Union is the same party as the Croatian Republican Party that contested the 1991 election? If you do have evidence, it would be helpful if you could add it to the party's article, as otherwise editors will click through and find an article that gives no indication they are the same party. Cheers, Number   5  7  18:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * that was their original name Braganza (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks for confirming. It would be really helpful if you could update the party's article to include this information, as otherwise people might click through and think it's a mistaken link. Cheers, Number   5  7  12:27, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Braganza. Thank you for your work on Democrats (Slovakia). User:Ppt91, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ppt91   talk   18:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)


 * No 8 & the website mention "Demokrati" as the name Braganza (talk) 18:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited People's Alliance (Turkey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC)


 * because it was circular (Sov.->VB->Sov.) it didnt allowed me to do this Braganza (talk) 12:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * In such cases you can request the move at WP:RMT and an admin or page mover will deal with it. Or just leave a note on my talk page. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:15, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to List of films featuring giant monsters have been removed because you cited the information you added to IMDb. As discussed at WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is considered a questionable source, and generally should not be used as a sole reference. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reliable source, or with an additional source confirming the information from IMDb. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikis are similarly unreliable per WP:SPS. DonIago (talk) 13:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol provincial elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left-wing coalition (Italy).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of films featuring giant monsters, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:59, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Symbols
Every picture, logo, or drawing is automatically protected by copyright law even if made by a child or not registered. So on Commons you can find mostly 3 kind of logos, licensed free by the author, very old o very simple. Simple logos can not be copyrighted. So I suggest to ask, logo by logo to, c:Commons:Village_pump/Copyright Pierpao (talk) 08:33, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * thank you Braganza (talk) 08:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Remember that differently than this wiki (en wikipedia), fair use it's not allowed on Commons--Pierpao (talk) 08:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Slovak Parliamentary Numbers
Could you correct them on either the NC's page or the next election, as both pages have differing numbers for parties. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 17:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * i will ask my slovak friends Braganza (talk) 17:51, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay :) ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 17:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * the National Council (Slovakia) now has the current composition Braganza (talk) 17:02, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 17:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Will, Opportunity and Solidarity Logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Will, Opportunity and Solidarity Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Your opinion on Talk:Green Left (Denmark)
Sorry to write to you again. I'm just super frustrated right now, because I have hard time really understanding what exactly the reason for keeping it the color as dark red is. Party logos are not the same thing as what colors each party are associated with. There are examples of political party logos who have multiple colors, but on wikipedia we only use one color, and I really belive that the color should be what the popular association with the party is, instead of how the logo design is. Die Linke - Liberal Alliance - Danish People's Party - DUP - Socialist Left Party - Christian Democratic Party - Swedish People's Party of Finland - Fine Gael - Lega - Forza Italia are examples of parties not using their logo colors, so I really fail to understand why we can't use the same logic for Green Left. It's just much better for maps and images on wikipedia (who doesn't use have the party names included) to have an easy seperation between the parties. If we kept Dark Red (the color that the media use for Social Democrats), readers might think that the information we have on Green Left is about the Social Democrats.

The reason I write to you on your talk page, is the hope of getting an explanation I can agree with, so I would appreciate it if you would argue why you have decided to support Dark Red instead of Hot Pink.

I hope you have a nice day :) Thomediter (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Turkey
Hi

we need a diagram for Permanent Deputation for TBMMM. Panam2014 (talk) 10:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC)


 * i am the wrong guy Braganza (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Move review for Operation Gideon (2020)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Operation Gideon (2020). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. WMrapids (talk) 02:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Opinion polling for the 2023 Slovak parliamentary election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page For the People.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on JWA List
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page JWA List, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Braganza&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1181700195 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=JWA_List&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1181700195%7CJWA%20List%5D%5D Ask for help])

User:Uniru288
Hello, how are you, the user is constantly reversing my editions in Frente Renovador, returning to the center-left political position when the references do not indicate that. In addition, he is also doing the same in La Libertad Avanza. Superpowersjam (talk) 18:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I would recommend you go to the discussion page and we will have a discussion about the position. If MMQ735 or Uniru288 causes any problems afterwards, you should follow the guidelines on Edit warring and report them to the admins (Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring). Braganza (talk) 18:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Republican Left/Republican Union
Re your recent edits to French elections, do you have a source that supports the fact that Democratic Republican Alliance = Republican Left and Republican Union = Republican Federation? I couldn't find anything when I was reformatting those articles, hence not linking them. Also, readers will find it a bit confusing to click on a link to "Republican Union" and end up at an article titled "Republican Federation" that does not even mention the phrase "Republican Union".

Also regarding this, the reason I reverted you was because I regularly see you adding unsourced ideology-based categories to articles that seem to be based purely on their names. If you are going to add categories related to ideologies, please make sure those ideologies are actually sourced in the article. Cheers, Number   5  7  18:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)


 * "Left Republicans/"Républicain de Gauche" was the parliamentary group of the Democratic Republican Alliance as referred to their english & french articles while the Republican Union is "Democratic and Republican Union" Braganza (talk) 18:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Braganza (talk) 18:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Can you provide sources for the Left Republicans query. And re Republican Union, why did you link to the Republican Federation rather than Democratic and Republican Union? (and this also needs a source to confirm it is the same thing). Number   5  7  18:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Next Cypriot legislative election
Hello, Braganza,

Thank you for creating Next Cypriot legislative election.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Hi Braganza, nice work on your new article. It would benefit from inclusion in appropriate Wikiprojects. It currently relies on a single reference, and so requires additional referencing - e.g., what is the basis for the date of the election, and the voting system; where were the opinion polls published, etc. Good job!"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

<span style="font-family:Verdana, sans-serif">Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Socialists and Democrats (Hungarian political party)
Hello Braganza! I just saw the hungarian political party, which is splited from the Hungarian Socialist Party. The 1st party is a Democratic Coalition (Ferenc Gyurcsány's party), the 2nd is the István Újhelyi's party, and the 3rd party is the Socialists and Democrats, which is founded by Attila Mesterházy, who also was a member of the Hungarian Socialist Party. These political parties is splited from the Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP), the first is the Democratic Coalition, the second is the Opportunity Community, and the third is the Socialists and Democrats. The MSZP is joined to the Left coalition, which one of the party was a member, this party is called the Jobbik - Conservatives. The Jobbik was a Far-Right political party, before the Jobbik is changed they ideology, and turned into the Centre-Right political party, and the Our Homeland Movement is splited from the Jobbik, and the Jobbik is now called Jobbik - Conservatives, Márton Gyöngyösi changed the Jobbik's name to Jobbik - Conservatives. Braganza, can you create a new page, which is will be called Socialists and Democrats ? And by the way, Happy New Year to you! KovZXad1970 (talk) 20:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * does the party have any representation or will they run in the European election? if not i fear the article could be deleted cause others might see them as too unimportant Braganza (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Braganza Yes yes! The Socialists and Democrats is run for the 2024 European Parliament Election in Hungary, also the Opportunity Community is run too, the Second Reform Era Party is too, the Our Homeland Movement, the Jobbik - Conservatives, the MSZDP, the Everybody's Hungary People's Party, and the other hungarian political parties also run on the 2024 European Parliament Election too! It is really truth Braganza! These parties is running for the 2024 EU Parliament Election, but also Péter Jakab's political party On the People's Side party is running in the EU Parliament election too. But the Second Reform Era Party and the Everybody's Hungary People's Party is do not run for the 2024 local elections in Hungary, for some reasons. KovZXad1970 (talk) 21:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * is there a full list of parties yet? Braganza (talk) 21:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Braganza Yes! 2024 European Parliament Elections in Hungary page is still not avaliable in this Wikipedia, but the hungarian version is avaliable. But you don't speak hungarian ? I just asking about it. KovZXad1970 (talk) 21:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * i dont, but can use Google translate lol Braganza (talk) 21:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Braganza Right. I speak English and Hungarian language. The 2024 local elections in Hungary is will be on June 2024, with the 2024 European Parliament Elections in Hungary. The Fidesz is running with the KDNP, just like in 2009, and 2014, and 2019, and also 2024, just like the local elections since 2006, and since the 2006 Hungarian Parliamentary Election. The Our Homeland Movement is running on the EU elections and the local elections, and this party is not running for coalition for other parties in Hungary. Gergely Karácsony is running for the local election in 2024, in Budapest, he is supported by the MSZP, Párbeszéd, Momentum and the DK, the Jobbik is not supporting Karácsony, just like the Our Homeland Movement party, and the LMP. The Jobbik is got their own mayor, just like the Our Homeland Movement, and the Fidesz, and the LMP too. The EU Election is also set in Slovakia, Slovenia, and the other EU member countries. You know, the Péter Jakab's party the On the People's Side party is splited from the Jobbik, just like the ReforMers party, which is founded by Andrea Varga-Damm, and the Civic Response, which is also splited from the Jobbik. That's all i know. The first party which is splited from the Jobbik, is the Force and Determination, the second is the Our Homeland Movement, the third is the Civic Response, the fourth is the ReforMers, and the fifth is the On the People's Side party. Braganza, i know, the Our Homeland Movement is called Jobbik 2.0, because this party is an Radical Right-Wing political party, which is similar to the MIÉP (István Csurka's party), the MIÉP is called Hungarian Justice and Life Party, in hungarian meaning Magyar Igazság és Élet Pártja, and the Our Homeland Movement is Mi Hazánk Mozgalom. The Ferenc Gyurcsány's party is called Democratic Coalition (DK), which means Demokratikus Koalíció in hungarian. That's all i know. KovZXad1970 (talk) 21:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Italian regional elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IND.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1929 Czechoslovak parliamentary election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rusyn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol
Hello Braganza! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

National affiliation of Italia in Comune
Do you have any sources for this edit in Italia in Comune? I'm not aware of any link between Azione and IIC. SilverShadow2 (talk) 17:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * it was twitter actually, ultimora irrc Braganza (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * it was a claim by +E even Braganza (talk) 09:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * On that same tweet, Pizzarotti himself denied the news. At the moment, both Pizzarotti and Falasca are still member of +E: if and when they'll leave to join Action, we'll update their pages. Moreover I think it's not correct to link IIC with what Pizzarotti and Falasca do: for example, Alessio Pascucci joined Greens and Left list at 2023 Lazio regional election. IIC is at the moment inactive, and what their former members do now is not something relevant for the party itself. SilverShadow2 (talk) 11:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

RFP affiliate in Subcarpathia?
Hi Braganza. I noticed you added that the Russian National Autonomous Party would have been an affiliate of the Russian Fascist Party. Any reference for this claim? -- Soman (talk) 23:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


 * its a claim brought up by russian wikipedia but looking into it i cant verify, the link for the source given starts with page 194 (104 is used) Braganza (talk) 05:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)