User talk:BrahmanAdvaita

Ah, yes! My mistake!
Ah yes, that's my mistake! I somehow found you are trying to add 3000 BC, actually I was trying to remove that line (you can see edit summary Followers accept the Bhagavada Gita as historical fact and date it to 3102 BC. - Unreferenced!. So, aim of your edit and my edit was same! --Tito Dutta (Message) 16:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * But, I have found 3 RS and added it back! You can discuss in article's talk page!--Tito Dutta (Message) 16:49, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Join the discussion! Tito Dutta (Message) 17:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied! --Tito Dutta (Message) 17:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

New Message
At least new message has been posted here: Talk:Bhagavad_Gita -- Tito Dutta  ✉  21:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

New Message July 10 2012
At least one new message has been posted Talk:Bhagavad_Gita. -- Tito Dutta  ✉  22:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops, date should be July 9 according to Wikipedia UTC time date, I was following my computer's time, anyway, please ignore it! -- Tito Dutta  ✉  22:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Heads up!
Hello, an SPI report has been made where you are involved. I am little bit surprised to see this SPI report, but, I neither support nor oppose it. Try to defend yourself if possible Sockpuppet investigations/Thigle -- Tito Dutta  ✉  00:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)