User talk:Brahmschubert/October 2008

Signature
Under "preferences" you can check the "Raw signature" box, then enter whatever wiki code you want to produce the effects. (And thanks for the compliment.) HTH, Her Pegship  (tis herself) 23:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah - it looks good! Grutness...wha?  00:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

B&M-Stub
Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha?  23:04, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi again - you asked: Did the stub proposing article tell me how to create a new stub? WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals tells you how to propose a stub type, and tells you that once it's been proposed, discussed and agreeed upon, to follow the instructions for making a stub type at WP:STUB (alternatively, you could leave the creation of the stub type to the people who archive things at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals - they regularly make stub types, so know how to do it. WP:STUB tells you how to make a stub type, but also reminds you not to make one unless you propose it first. Grutness...wha?  22:49, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Snowball
Frankly, I think it's still a stub, because the majority of the article is just review quotes, not a description of the book's content. IMHO. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 00:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

the Batman incidents revert
If you are talking about your Sept 10th edit, then it was reverted because it failed WP:BLP policy and included non-important information about the person whose legs hit the victim. If you are talking about a different revert, then please point out which one you are refering to. SpikeJones (talk) 01:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Requests for permissions/Denied/November 2008. SoxBot X (talk) 14:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:My article Chesterfield (fencing and decking)
The article was deleted because it didn't actually indicate what was notable about the company. It just said that it was "known in many countries" which is pretty vague and was not supported by a citation. The page WP:ORG outlines the Wikipedia guidelines for notability that must be present in articles about companies. ... disco spinster   talk  01:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:Word document screenshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Word document screenshot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)