User talk:Braincricket/Archive 1

Welcome
Hello, Braincricket, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! — Sumsum2010 (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Punctuation in article titles?
If there is a "?" or a "!" in the title of a work of art, such as a novel or film, should I include that punctuation in the article title itself?


 * In short, generally, yes. For more detail, see Article titles, especially Article titles-- SPhilbrick  T  02:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Found it at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (article titles)''. Thanks!  Braincricket (talk) 04:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

A tool for finding the right category
This is a newbie question: are there any handy tools for searching through categories? So far, I have been doing all my "searching" manually, by browsing through Special:Categories or Portal:Contents/Categories, which is a real pain. Is there a better way to find the category I'm looking for? Thanks. Braincricket (talk) 08:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)


 * You can always try a Google search. For more precise searching, you can go to Special:Search (which is one of the "Special" pages -- a link to Special pages is in the bottom of the Toolbox over in the far left side of the page), put in the term that you want, click the Advanced button, then unclick the checkbox next to "Article" and check the box next to "Category", which will search for your term only in categories. I hope that helps. :)  Banaticus (talk) 09:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Plagiarism?
Hey helpful editor, I was doing my rounds wikifying and ran across an article that is a blatant copy-and-paste job from a page on another website. The article Human rights in Mauritania cites this page a total of 84 times! So I checked it out: it is a report written by the U.S. Department of State. I skimmed WP:PD and I think because it is a work of the Federal Government it is not eligible for copyright protection. But still, the whole paper, verbatim? Isn't that frowned upon? What is to be done? Maybe a proposed deletion, or a db-copyvio? Or maybe something less drastic, like proposing a major re-write/restructuring on the article's talk page? The editor who did the copy-and-pasting was at least forthright in saying that the content was just a dump from a US Govt report. Thanks for the advice. Braincricket (talk) 07:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * If the source is public domain, the article is not eligible for speedy deletion as copyright violation. Proposed deletion would be unwise as well: It's better to have a bad-written article about a notable subject than no article at all because the former invites people to work on it. I would suggest you list it at Copyright problems to get input whether it's really public domain and if it is, tag it accordingly, for example with rewrite. Regards  So Why  07:30, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Public Policy Initiative Recruiting Assessors for Spring
Hi Braincricket, I saw that you are in the Wikification Leaderboard of February 2011 and I would like to ask you if you want to participate in an initiative [Public Policy Initiative (PPI)] carried out by WikiProject United States Public Policy. If you are interested in research and want to experiment with article assessment or just want to help out, please, join our group of assessors because we really need your help. If you have questions or need more information, please check out the discussion on the assessment tab and the WPUSPP Assessment department, or contact, who is the Research Analyst for the project. Also, if you know valuable and trusted editors who are expert in USPP and/or articles assessment, please invite them to participate to this project. The work to be done is not so much, and will start next spring. Your help would be much needed and greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance and all the best. –p joe f (talk • contribs) 10:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Feedback Dashboard task force
Hi Braincricket,

Since you were a part of the WikiGuides project, I thought I'd give you a heads-up about a new way you can help/mentor newbies on en.wiki: we've recently released a feature called the Feedback Dashboard, a queue that updates in real time with feedback and editing questions from new registered contributors who have attempted to make at least one edit. Steven Walling and I are putting together a task force for experienced Wikipedians who might be interested in monitoring the queue and responding to the feedback: details are here at Feedback Dashboard. Please sign up if you're interested in helping out! Thanks, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 22:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Vampire bat CE
Thank you for copyediting the Common vampire bat article. Is there more work to be done? I'm told that the lede paragraph needs copyediting. LittleJerry (talk) 03:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Hey LittleJerry (talk). Ya I'm pretty much done—I went through all the sections and did my best to improve the grammar, flow, etc. I didn't touch the lead section at all, as the GA discussion on Talk:Common Vampire Bat indicated that it should be left for last so that it can accurately summarize the content of the rest of the article.  There was only one more thing I wanted to do, that is using this reference to add some info and formalize the tone of the Feeding section.  I'll look over it later tonight and tweak a sentence or two, then slap a GOCE stamp on the talk page.  You've done a lot of great work on the article; it's been my pleasure to help out.  Cheers. Braincricket (talk) 00:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I did add in more lines in the lead section so it can cover more of the article. I think it is ready for a CE. LittleJerry (talk) 04:10, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Voorhees Middle School
Hi. Regarding your nomination of Voorhees Middle School for speedy deletion as non-notable (WP:CSD), you should be aware that schools are explicitly exempt from deletion by this category. If you still believe it should be deleted, you should use WP:AFD. Stephen! Coming... 09:55, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Oops! I did not know that—thanks for telling me. Braincricket (talk) 09:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

tutorials
Thanks for your kind note. Yes, I must review them all. I've "Comma workshop" and "Amiguity" pages in mind, too. Tony  (talk)  08:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Naruto Uzumaki
Thanks for your edits at Naruto Uzumaki. The article needs some copy-edit, but I'm mainly concerned about the reception section's context. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 02:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * No problem! It will be another couple days before I am completely finished. I'll leave some comments on Talk:Naruto Uzumaki if I have any questions, and I'll let you know what I think about the Reception section. FYI: I have neither seen the anime nor read the manga, so you will be getting the opinion of a "general reader". Peace. Braincricket (talk) 03:12, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I that's better so that the general reader fully understands it. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 11:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the comments in the article's talk page. Already responded to them. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


Wilhelmina Will (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Good tidings to you and your kin! :) Wilhelmina Will (talk) 09:35, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

How do I avoid a lame edit war?
Here's the story. I was going through the Wikify back log when I came across this article. I wasn't able to wikify it, so instead I tagged it with three templates: conflict-of-interst, no-lead, and jargon, which I hoped would inform readers and attract other (more experienced) editors to address the problems. After some more thought, I convinced myself that the article wasn't notable and that the main contributor was using Wikipedia as a soapbox to promote and lend credibility to the subject of the article—so I PROD'd it. The main contributor reverted the PROD (which is fine) and wrote a rather scathing response on the talk page. I tried to be as civil as I could in my response, and explained my reasons for tagging and proposing deletion. Then I nominated the article for deletion, and the main contributor responded by removing my three tags.

I stand by my reasons for nominating it for deletion, and I'll accept (and learn from) whatever they decide at AfD. But even if it's not deleted, I think the tags I put up are appropriate and may eventually help improve the quality of the article. I would like to put the tags back up and add a template the talk page, because if the article isn't deleted then they could really help it in the long run. But the main contributor seems to think he owns the article, and I think whatever I do will just be reverted.

I appreciate his position—I would be pissed too if someone PROD'd my article. But I would like to think I could count to ten and provide a civil and rational argument in favor of its being kept. Anyway, how do I avoid an edit war? Should I just let AfD run its course and leave this one alone? I would appreciate another opinion, as it is just me and the main contributor at odds right now. I am trying to see this as an opportunity to learn something about conflict resolution and Wikipedia policy. Am I just insane? Thanks. Braincricket (talk) 23:44, 27 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Having only glanced at the situation briefly I can whole heartedly state that the way you portray the situation above it seems clear that you are doing things the correct way... but I will look into the specifics that you mention in detail shortly. The only thing you might have considered, in addition to the steps taken above, would have been to request a third opinion prior to the AFD nomination.  Now that AFD is open you will essentially be getting many third-opinions, and those should include comments on what tags or what further improvements should be made to the article if it is kept.  If nothing else, I for one thank you for your maturity in handling this.  Regards,  7  04:47, 28 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I didn't know I could have requested a third opinion—I'll be sure to take advantage of that if I get myself into a similar situation in the future. Thanks for the kind words and encouragement. Braincricket (talk) 05:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Re:Your copy edit request at the GOCE (Jailhouse Rock)
Thanks for the copy-editing, now I'll work in that over-detailed plot section.-- GD uwen  Tell me!  16:56, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
My heartfelt thanks go to you. Much appreciated work. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 08:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks again. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 05:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello
I was wondering if you would be able to copy-edit We Found Love (video) to FA standard please? I have listed it officially here. Thanks. Calvin  &bull; Watch n'   Learn 06:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey Calvin999, I am flattered by the request, but I am fairly new to copy editing and an FA might be a little beyond me. If you want a real bang up job, you're better off asking one of the coordinators at the Guild. I see you put the article in the queue, so someone should be getting to it. We have a drive going on, by the way, if you're interested in getting some practice and helping out. Best regards. Braincricket (talk) 15:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks. Calvin  &bull; Watch n'   Learn 15:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Codex Zacynthius
Thank you very much. English is my third language and editing on wikipedia is my way for improving of my English. Unfortunately it is very difficult to find user who will copyedit my articles. Thank you very much. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 02:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Roman Dacia
Hi. Am I right in thinking it's complete now, and I can archive it? Best, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 10:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Copy-edit
Hey do you accept requests? Best, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  01:02, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Yo Jona! Sorry, but I'm not accepting personal requests. If you list the article on WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests then I or another editor will get to it. Cheers. Braincricket (talk) 00:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. Best, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  00:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

D&D copyedits
Hey, thanks for taking a look at these articles! Are you a fan too, or do you just happen to be picking articles on a similar theme? I know that User:Torchiest was doing copyedits on D&D articles last year for the GOCE. BOZ (talk) 01:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the kind words! Ya, I started playing a Paladin with the 4th ed. rules about a year ago, but I just moved to a new city and haven't yet found a group to play with here. The January drive is winding down and I've been using CatScan to find sci-fi and fantasy related articles. Right now I am picking through The Orcs of Thar before moving on to Call of Cthulhu Collectible Card Game. I don't play the card game but I love H. P. Lovecraft. Best regards. Braincricket (talk) 01:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, great, enjoy! I've been trying to chonicle the history of the game, so hopefully you will learn plenty as you read through the articles. I will also mention that I started a Facebook group for disucssing the upcoming 5th edition, if you are interested in that. BOZ (talk) 03:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Please be more careful
Hi Braincricket. I just reverted this edit where you changed "passed away" to "died" because it was part of a quotation. Please be more careful, or teach your script to ignore anything inside a quotation template. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 03:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry about that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I had been looking out for quotations, but apparently not hard enough. I'll be more careful in the future. Regards. Braincricket (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Euphemism
Hello! Saw your edit of "died" over "passed away" on Balgandharva (film). Does this WP:EUPHEMISM apply for plot stories also? Like of films or novels or likewise? These are stories and we dont tell the actual facts (even if the film is based on some real-life incident). This figure of speech in the plot summary like sections can be used to present the way it is shown in the film. Why do we have to used "died" in it? What do you think? -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 06:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey Animeshkulkarni! There have been two discussions about this here and here. One of the arguments against using "passed away" is that it has non-neutral, peaceful, sad, or spiritual connotations. For example, the Buddha "passed away" but Adolf Hitler "died". I haven't seen Balgandharva, but you're saying that those peaceful or tragic connotations are appropriate when talking about Narayan's daughter? If so, why not just add a little more detail to make it explicit: "She died peacefully in her bed", or "...his daughter died. Despite his overwhelming emotional loss, he went ahead with the performance..." I think by avoiding the use of "passed away" in that manner, you could actually add clarity and depth to the plot summary. :-)


 * Another argument against using "passed away" is that it could introduce ambiguity in certain contexts, especially if the reader is not fluent in English. For example, "to pass away" also means "to move on" or "to depart". So one could interpret the sentence as "On the opening of his play, his daughter moved away (to a different city)." It makes sense in context, because that could cause Narayan emotional distress if he were close with his daughter; having never seen the film, and as a still-learning English speaker, one might (mistakenly) think that was what the sentence meant. By using "died", you make it very clear what you mean.


 * Well, that's my opinion. If you still think that "passed away" would do better in the article, then by all means go for it. But I think the plot summary could be even better if you used "died" and elaborated on those ideas which "passed away" only implies. What do you think? Best Regards. Braincricket (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Declination edits
Hi:

You used AWB to make some edits to the Declination article. Mostly, you changed ordinal numbers in dates to cardinal ones, e.g. you changed February 5th to February 5.

But in most of the English-speaking world, ordinal numbers are preferred in this context. Today's date, written by anyone in Britain, India, etc., is February 5th, or 5th February.

When I first came to North America from Britain, I was surprised to see cardinal numbers used. For the first 30+ years of my life, I had never encountered them used this way.

Wikipedia is supposed to be international. Usage that is accepted anywhere is accepted here. Right?

DOwenWilliams (talk) 19:30, 5 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey DOwenWilliams! Thanks for bringing this to my attention—it is possible to make a lot of mistakes very quickly with AWB. I appreciate that in your experience you've used ordinals to write dates, but I'm not sure if I would agree that most of the English-speaking world uses them in that way, and that was not my experience when I studied in London. At any rate, the Wikipedia Manual of Style states that Wikipedia does not use ordinals for dates. The Chicago Manual of Style states "When specific dates are expressed, cardinal numbers are used, although these may be pronounced as ordinals." Ordinals are used if the day is mentioned without the month or year (in which case it is usually spelled out), e.g. "On November 5, McManus declared victory. By the twenty-fifth, most of his supporters had deserted him." The BBC News website uses cardinal numbers for their dates, as does Al Jazeera English and The Times of India. I was just trying to conform to the Wikipedia MoS for the sake of consistency across the encyclopedia. If you think the MoS "Dates and numbers" section should be amended, you can always discuss it on the talk page (someone already brought it up in this section). Best regards. Braincricket (talk) 23:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Admittedly, it is nearly 40 years since I lived in England, and usage there may have (certainly has, in other contexts) changed since then. I looked up the Wikipedia article on Calendar date, and was told that using cardinal numbers in dates is a common, but far from universal, usage in British English. Okay. Maybe so. But, even if cardinals are common, ordinals are certainly accepted, so in the interest of universal acceptability, surely they should be accepted in Wikipedia too.


 * Incidentally, I doubt that many Brits would let their use of English be dictated by anything called the "Chicago Manual of Style", even if it does have an office in London. It probably includes such barbarisms as saying the the comma a few words back should be inside the quotation marks! Such abuse would make any educated Briton cringe.


 * I edited another article this afternoon, and used the spelling "metre". Then I noticed that elsewhere in the same article someone had put "meter". A bit of research showed me that "metre" (meaning a unit of distance) is correct even in the United States, but "meter", in that sense, is not accepted in many other countries. So what should Wikipedia do? My own feeling is that we should accept anything that is regarded as correct anywhere. If an author uses "metre" or "meter", or even both in the same sentence, we should just accept what he writes, without correcting it. That's the general attitude here in Canada, where I now live, where U.S. and British usages are both generally employed. Usage diversity enriches Canadian English. It would similarly enrich Wikipedia.


 * DOwenWilliams (talk) 00:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Haha, you got me with the Chicago MoS—unfortunately that's the only style guide I have sitting around the house at the moment. You'll be glad to know that WP uses the logical quotation (British) style! As for metre vs. meter and other spelling differences, the rule of thumb is to retain the original variety and to remain consistent within the article. There are templates you can add to the talk page so editors know which spellings should be used. So you're right, when there is no "correct" way of writing something, we should embrace diversity. I still think there is consensus that dates should be cardinals, unless you are talking about non-specific dates (e.g. "the first of the month"). I'll stop by the library tomorrow and see if I can pick up The Oxford Guide to Style. Cheers. :-) Braincricket (talk) 00:53, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day!
Wilhelmina Will (talk) 10:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyedit
This may be a bit rude of me, but since you did such a good job copyediting the Ba'ath Party article, I wondered if you could take a quick look at the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Syria Region article – its a DYK nominee. --TIAYN (talk) 16:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey TIAYN! I am flattered, and I would be happy to take a look at your new article. I have been on a little wikibreak, so give me a few days to get back into the swing of things. Best regards. Braincricket (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) --TIAYN (talk) 22:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Please leave the small template in this map
HIV-AIDS world map - DALY - WHO2004.svg for HIV and AIDS per 100,000 inhabitants as of 2004.

{{legend|#b3b3b3| no data }} {{legend|#ffff65| ≤ 10 }} {{legend|#fff200| 10–25 }} {{legend|#ffdc00| 25–50 }} {{legend|#ffc600| 50–100 }} {{legend|#ffb000| 100–500 }} {{legend|#ff9a00| 500–1000 }}

{{legend|#ff8400| 1000–2500 }} {{legend|#ff6e00| 2500–5000 }} {{legend|#ff5800| 5000–7500 }} {{legend|#ff4200| 7500-10000 }} {{legend|#ff2c00| 10000-50000 }} {{legend|#cb0000| ≥ 50000 }} ]] Thanks Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 11:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem. I thought the general fix suggested by AWB was appropriate, but I will leave it as is. Cheers. Braincricket (talk) 17:58, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

autowikibrowser
It seems you are using old settings and thus you get exception messages. Please delete old settings and download latest version from http://toolserver.org/~awb/snapshots/ -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Legal outsourcing article
Thanks for correcting the typos in my edits to the article on Legal outsourcing. Are there any changes you would like to see, in terms of the writing style? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virtualpractice (talk • contribs) 04:38, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! This is actually the first time someone has not complained about my use of AWB. Ha! I'd be happy to help clean up the formatting and layout of the article, and maybe do some light copy editing. You can check out the diff afterward to get an idea of the sort of changes I made. I think your contributions to the article so far have been really positive, especially your addition of about ten new footnotes. If you're concerned about your writing style, you might want to read User:Tony1/How to improve your writing—it's a tremendous resource. Regards. Braincricket (talk) 05:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your help. I think the "Issues of confidentiality and attorney–client privilege" should be merged with the criticism section.It feels apropriate. I am going to begin merging them. Tell me if there is any objection. Virtualpractice (talk) 04:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Be bold! Regards. Braincricket (talk) 04:45, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed merger
Hi Braincricket, thanks for your suggestion to merge Mainstudio with Edwin van Gelder. I think it's a good idea, I just added Mainstudio's projects to Edwin van Gelder. The Mainstudio page can be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhc2011 (talk • contribs) 12:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

A question about the Orphan template you put on the Willard Middle School article
Hi Braincricket, you recently put a orpan template on the Willard Middle School Wikipedia article. I linked two related Wikipedia articles to the Willard Middle School article. (a)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Unified_School_District, (b)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King_Middle_School_(Berkeley). I don't know If I can link anything else to the Willard Middle School page. Can you suggest me anything else to link to it. May I remove the template now? Thank you, for helping me edit the Willard Middle School page, have a flawless 4th of July. (:

Webclient101 (talk) 20:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey Webclient! Ya, I just tagged it during New Page Patrol because it had < 3 links to it, but you fixed that. I am going to go ahead and remove the template. Nice work on the article, by the way. Best Regards. Braincricket (talk) 01:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

To say thanks!
To say thanks for your participation in the June 2012 wikification drive. Your efforts are always appreciated! Cheers! :) Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 03:44, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Greater Grace
not that there was anything wrong with your edit but shouldn't the edit summary match what you're doing? StarM 21:57, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You're right. It was WikiProject TypoScan that brought me to the article, and the folks over there like it when you include a link to their project in the edit summary. Obviously I decided to delete that paragraph instead of just correcting the typo in it. Maybe I should add "and cleanup" to my edit summary or something that's a bit more accurate when I make larger changes like that actually representative of the changes I make. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Regards. Braincricket (talk) 22:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * NP. I'm amazed that the text had lingered so long (March 2010!) so I'm glad it had a typo otherwise it might have remained until 3010! I think your idea of an addition is a good one. It just makes it easier for people who have the articles on their watchlist. If something like that isn't possible with AWB or a pain, don't worry . Was just a thought. Have a good day StarM 22:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Nazi invasion
Thanks for defending Feminism against the Nazi invasion! Kaldari (talk) 18:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages
Dear Author/Braincricket

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Pancreatic Cancer. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hydra_Rain and if interested, please visit my Talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Hydra. My edit wasn't very substantial. But you're probably interested in all kinds of editors and editing patterns, so I'll be happy to participate in your study. Give my regards to Jeremy Bentham. Braincricket (talk) 16:32, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Braincricket (your username amuses me so much btw!! I absolutely love it, haha) Ok, back to business. You are right, I am interested in all sorts of editing behaviour. If you would still like to participate my research project, can you please send me an e-mail to nusa.faric.11@undefineducl.ac.uk and I will send you further instructions. Thank you! Nuša Hydra Rain (talk) 20:34, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Braincricket, I saw from your survey responses that you would prefer to answer the questions in the written form. I can send you the questions, no probs. I will e-mail them to you on wikipedia mail just now. You can also e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@undefineducl.ac.uk  Thank you very much! :) Nuša Hydra Rain (talk) 11:12, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: July Newsletter and August Drive

 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
SarahStierch (talk) 01:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 27c579bdc9794332a78dd180ad28de9f
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! 05:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification
Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the wikify template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify

DYK nomination of Teen Age Message
Hello! Your submission of Teen Age Message at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Maile66 (talk) 23:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Relativity
Thanks for the improvements in theory of relativity. The main focus of editors was thus far directed to special relativity or general relativity and other articles, so it's good that also this introductory article which summarizes everything about relativity gets improved. --D.H (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks D.H. My goal is to flesh it out over the next month or so, making sure to keep it entry-level and summary-style. I think it could be a good sort of portal to the other articles related to relativity. Most of the structure is already there, it's just a matter of turning it into prose. It would be nice if we could make it a Good Article (or maybe even a Featured Article). Anyway, have a great weekend. Braincricket (talk) 19:03, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avukaya people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nyasa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

About etymology of Assam

 * The precise etymology of "Assam" in unknown. -This is not true.
 * A Vedic kingdom Prag-Jyotisa existed in the past. Present area of Assam fall inside Prag-Jyotisa.
 * Please review . Thanks!

Kurmaa (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Is this about a semi-automated edit I made to Assam? I don't know anything about Assam, I was just using AWB to fix typos and do general cleanup. I would encourage you to be bold and improve the article as best you can, making sure to cite reliable sources. Braincricket (talk) 04:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Yep! Sure I shall correct. -Kurmaa (talk) 05:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I looked at the article's history, and it seems like there have been some recent disputes over some of the content. It might be prudent to discuss your proposed changes on the article's talk page before you do anything controversial. Braincricket (talk) 05:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Teen Age Message
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:MMA
Hello,

i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!

Kevlar (talk) 00:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey Kevlar. I was probably just correcting typos with AWB or some such thing. Not really interested in writing about MMA topics right now, although I did do Judo and wrestling back in the day. Tell you what, if you end up nominating an MMA article for WP:GA in the future, I'll be happy to copy edit it for you. Good luck with the WikiProject. See you around. Braincricket (talk) 06:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Appreciation
Wow Thx! ok ill will text in my sandbox now.thx alot ^.^ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abyssal'Nebulaze (talk • contribs) 08:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it :) If you need any help don't hesitate to ask. Braincricket (talk) 08:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

How?
Hello.. how can i improve that article make more better?? I think with the new version is more better from old version.. i hope you will show me the better ways to improve that article.. about Article Legoland Malaysia (English version) Rafizah aziz (talk) 12:22, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey Rafizah. I appreciate all the hard work you put into Legoland Malaysia. Here are some suggestions:
 * Go easy on the pictures. In an article that size, maybe just one or two, or else it will get crowded.
 * It reads a little like an advertisement. Try writing about Legoland without promoting it. Know what I mean? We want to inform readers, not sell them tickets. Write from a neutral point of view.
 * Remember, everything you write has to be backed-up by reliable sources. Try not to use the Legoland website. Instead, use independent news stories and books.
 * Disneyland is an example of a pretty good article about an amusement park. Try to make Legoland Malaysia as good as that.


 * Use Talk:Legoland Malaysia if you run into trouble and other editors should be able to help you out. Don't hesitate to write to me if you have any questions or need advice. Have fun. Braincricket (talk) 12:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Blackburn
Please could you let me know your reason for the revision you made about witton park? everything that was added was correct but you chose to undo it. many thanxMarkdarrly (talk) 21:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey Mark. I reverted that because info was inserted before the reference (Duckworth, 79) which gives the impression that it's supported by Duckworth. Duckworth seems to be backing up the statement that "It is larger than all the town's other parks and playing fields put together", which was removed with your edit. My edit summary was "broke the reference". The thing to do is probably to leave the sentence about combined area with the reference intact, and insert your stuff in a different part of the paragraph – either right before or right after it. I'll go ahead and tweak it, and you can see if you like it. Cheers. Braincricket (talk) 02:35, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

thanks 4 the info, im new at this! before i registered a user name, i wrote the notable events section on the blackburn page. I would appreciate your feedback on this. many thanx markdarrly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markdarrly (talk • contribs) 08:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * That was a really interesting story. I was able to find three references, including a video from the BBC, and I took the liberty of inserting them into the text. Keep up the good work. It sounds to me like June Anne Devaney's was a landmark case in forensics. I wonder if it is notable enough for its own article. If you can dredge up some more sources then I'd be happy to help you write it, if you're interested. Cheers. Braincricket (talk) 09:53, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

new article
Thank you for your feed back on the paragraph that I wrote. I would love to write an article about J A Devaney, I will start to do some research and when I have enough for an interesting piece, I would like to take up your offer of assistance in writing the article. Many thanks, Mark — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markdarrly (talk • contribs) 20:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

wth
put it back! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjones51 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Tom Jung
Just a thank you for the AWB clean up you did on the Tom Jung article - I have put a lot of work into the article/great to have some help! Jobrjobr (talk) 12:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually I hadn't stopped to read it until just now. Every once in a while I go through Category:J. R. R. Tolkien looking for typos and whatnot. Today I learned that Tom Jung created the posters for Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Plan 9, and Lord of the Rings. Some of my favorite movies! I love all those posters but never knew who made them until today. I think you've done a fantastic job with the article. If I can improve it any further, I will. Take it easy. Braincricket (talk) 12:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

52-Hertz Whale
I've answered your question on the nomination template. Maile66 (talk) 01:26, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation newsletter
Hey. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:17, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK lead whale
I just put the lonely whale article and sound file as the lead DYK in prep set 3. Very interesting article, thanks for writing it. I feel so sorry for the whale. Pumpkin Sky  talk  02:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Glad you liked it. I think the lead could be expanded to increase poignancy. Can whales cry? Braincricket (talk) 02:31, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

52-Hertz Whale at DYK discussion page
FYI - Discussion re 52-hertz whale in Queue 3 Maile66 (talk) 19:12, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for 52-Hertz whale
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 September 2012 (UTC)