User talk:Bramhg

Welcome!
Hello, Bramhg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Robomq.io, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &mdash; kikichugirl  speak up! 04:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of "Robomq.io"
A page you created, Robomq.io, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. &mdash; kikichugirl  speak up! 04:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robomq.io


A tag has been placed on Robomq.io requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -War wizard90 (talk) 04:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)


 * The usual criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia is explained here. Very basically, we only summarise information that's already published in reliable sources that're independent of the subject. We do this to ensure both that our information is verifiable, and that it can be written neutrally. If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers, Wily D 10:05, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Bramhg (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2015 (UTC) I went over the criteria. The intent of the page was to publish about a product that is a Software as a Service. I see that similar products have page on wikipedia. For example ironMQ, StormMQ and AWS SQS. These product are in the same category as robomq.io. What makes robomq.io eligible for deletion and not these others. I am somehow not on same page on application to criteria to similar incidents. Cheers.. Bramh


 * As I said above the usual criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia is explained here. Very basically, we only summarise information that's already published in reliable sources that're independent of the subject. We do this to ensure both that our information is verifiable, and that it can be written neutrally. The presence or absence of pages on similar topics is wholly irrelevant (and often, is just a matter of Wikipedia being a work in progress - such pages may yet be merged into more appropriate places deleted, who knows?).  And finding "like" things is dodgy; we have pages on some men, like Barack Obama, and not others, like my Uncle Mike.  Both are men, but one is suitable for an encyclopaedia, and the other ain't (sorry Mike!).  If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers,  Wily D  08:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Bramhg (talk) 14:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)After going through the links on neutrality and verifiability and reading your comments, when I look at actual data about software product listed on wikipedia- I am sorry to say that you guys are being biased and unfair on robomq.io software. I have cited such other software before which you chose to ignore as work in progress..


 * I haven't looked at the other examples - if those articles are in a bad state, eventually someone will address them. Wikipedia is a volunteer made work in progress, and the quality is known to vary from very good to very bad.  The quality is improving over time, though we're always keen to do better.   In any event, rombio.io gave no sources to show it met Notability, which is our usual inclusion criterion, nor any indication to believe such sources might exist.  Without them, there's no hope of ever writing a suitable article.  Other articles are other questions. Wily D  15:46, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. &mdash; kikichugirl  speak up! 04:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)