User talk:Brandmeister (old)/Archive 3

Image tagging for Image:Georgius_VI.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Georgius_VI.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:07, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

This image is tagged as being allowed under "fair use", but not used in any articles. Unless some reason to retain it is given, the image will be deleted seven days after: 28 October 2006 (4 November). Please remove this template if a reason for keeping this image has been provided, or it is still used in articles.

Use Orphaned fairuse not replaced to categorize by tag date. Notify the uploader with

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Periandros.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Periandros.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jastrow 11:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC) If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add Template:Not orphan to this page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again.orphaned fair use image as of 2006-10-28 (CSD I5)

Image:Ashley Leggat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ashley Leggat.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Mistake on Recent Changes Patrol
Sorry mistake on the revert on RC patrol my apologies. ¤~Persian Poet Gal 21:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It's ok :) --Brand спойт 21:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for understanding, my eyes get blurred trying to watch that list and stare at the diff pages :P. ¤~Persian Poet Gal 21:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Natzbols.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Natzbols.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 23:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Pornography in the United States
OK, I made a series of minor (mostly cosmetic) edits to Pornography in the United States. If you think it needs any more work, feel free to leave your suggestions on my talk page. --Eastlaw 03:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

131-year-old?
Brandmeister, in regards to the 131-year-old claimant from Dagestan: I've had people tell me they 'laughed' at that claim. It's one of the most preposterous claims made this year. Are you going to believe every UFO report that comes along? This woman's 'passport' was issued in 2006, not 1875, so it doesn't prove anything. We don't even have a day or month of birth. Read the longevity myths article. → R Young {yak ł talk } 19:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Greetings,

A search of literature finds that all nations have claimed extreme ages, including industrialized nations (i.e., Thomas Parr claimed to be 152 in the U.K. in 1635). After education and recordkeeping became compulsory, the longevity myths died out. Today, they still flourish in areas of poor recordkeeping. For the most recent claim, that the document was just issued indicates there really is no original birth record. For Shirali Mislimov, he was promoted as a nationalist longevity myth. Scientists believe that the human life span is about 120 years, with Jeanne Calment's 122 years the oldest proven life span.

Notably, when recordkeeping improves, myths decline. China claimed to have a 256-year-old in 1933. by 1982 the oldest person in China was '144'. In 1993, China's oldest person was '131'. Today, China's oldest person is '120.' Better recordkeeping results in more accurate data.

Note that we cannot be 100% certain that the 116-year-old woman in the U.S. is the world's oldest person. But if there is someone older, they are likely between 116 and 120 years old.

Sincerely, Robert Young→ R Young {yak ł talk } 19:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!
 Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including WPMILHIST Announcements there.
 * Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—and wherever—you'd like:


 * Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines outline some things to include.
 * Interested in working on a more complete article? The military history peer review and collaboration departments would welcome your help!
 * Working on featured-level articles? We have some advice for nominators, and an A-Class review process to help check high-quality articles.
 * Want to help with specific requests for assistance? Our requests page has extensive lists of requested articles, images, maps, and translations.
 * Interested in a particular area of military history? We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, or periods.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 21:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've finally decided to add myself :)) --Brand спойт 22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:Featured article candidates/History of Solidarity
Could you elaborate on your comment? I am not sure I understood it.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sex.com logo.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sex.com logo.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006
The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Vladimir Kramnik
I'm sorry, I was cleaning up the current sports events category and was not sure why this tag was on Kramnik. Apparently I was wrong by removing it. Cheers, SportsAddicted | discuss  13:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Near East relief quote in Armenia article
Please use Talk before reverting for the second time... Thanks. Serouj 23:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image
Hello Brandmeister. I've tagged Image:Tomatina 1165041.jpg as an orphaned fair use image because it is no longer used in any article, as required by the fair use policy. Please note that images for which replacements exist are not acceptable under fair use. The image will be deleted after seven days, as described in our criteria for speedy deletion. If you'd like to retrieve the image for personal use, please do so before that time. Thanks for your contributions. :) — {admin} Pathoschild 06:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Alice Barnham in Category:Medieval women
Are you sure she fits? Middle ages says they generally stop in the 16th century, and AB lived (1592-1650). She seems a bit later than Medieval. AnonEMouse (squeak) 21:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Ouch. Yes, she certainly was a woman, but we can't just put all women in the Category:Women category directly, the category would be useless with half our biographies in it, hundreds of thousands of articles. Do we have a "Renaissance Women" or something? AnonEMouse (squeak) 22:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm, the article hardly fits to any specific category. How about Category:British women? --Brand спойт 22:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * That was my problem at first ... hah! Got one. Category:British_viscountesses! AnonEMouse (squeak) 22:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for adding you signature to my autograph book Brandmeister. | A ndonic O</b> <i style="font-family:Times New Roman; color:Tan;">Talk</i> 01:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Heya
Do you still object to the FAC of Power: A New Social Analysis? If so, I'd love to know what else I can do to improve it. { Ben S. Nelson } Lucidish 16:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Russian Task Force Requested articles
Hi Brandmeister, know you're interested in the modern Russian military (noticed the milunit box you added to Russian Ground Forces, and thanks for your notes on the FAC nom for that). We've had a request, following the allocation of the main request list to the individual task forces, for an article on the TOS-1 Buratino SP MRL. Appreciate your contribution if you'd like to start it or help me to start it collaberatively (I'm more a military organisations person, not technology...) Cheers Buckshot06 06:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Cluny Article
Thanks for your help on the article. I've added a bit; feel free to edit if needed. jrcagle 21:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Blurred flag in Capitol photo
The reason why it is blurred is that it was a long exposure (at night), so the flag was moving while the photo was being taken. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 10:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:CooLio.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CooLio.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 07:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Fire Service
Brandmeister, welcome to the WikiProject Fire Service! It is my goal to increse the overall quality of articles on English Wikipedia relating to the fire service while keeping an international perspective. Please feel free to leave me a message with any questions! I look forward to working with you! --Daysleeper47 14:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Umbozero.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Umbozero.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Merry Christmas


Hi! I just want to say Merry Christmas to you! Have a nice holiday time. If you don't observe this event then I hope you don't mind this greeting. :) - Darwinek 20:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

XMAS gift
Lots of good intentions flying around, but not much in the way of useful stuff. Here is a nice template I found to organize your ever-growing collections of awards :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 14:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="align: center; width: 75%; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px black; background-color: ForestGreen;">
 * Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays ! | <b style="font-family:Papyrus; color:black;">A</b> ndonic <b style="font-family:Papyrus; color:Black; font-size:small;">O</b> <i style="font-family:Times New Roman; color:Tan;">Talk</i> 01:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Eugenie_of_York.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eugenie_of_York.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006
The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for wishing me a happy new year! | <b style="font-family:Papyrus; color:black;">A</b> ndonic <b style="font-family:Papyrus; color:Black; font-size:small;">O</b> <i style="font-family:Times New Roman; color:Tan;">Talk</i> 15:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! I wish you too happy new year and all the best. Regards, Grandmaster 06:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:1GebirgsDivision.PNG, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 08:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for signing my signature book. Current signee #24!!!!-- ¿  Why  1  9  9  1  <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;"><i style="color:green;">ESP.</i> | <i style="color:black;">Sign Here</i> 01:09, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:301.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:301.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:84 earthquake twins modern.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:84 earthquake twins modern.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — <font color="CEBE70">MECU ≈ talk 20:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Abakan_Coat_of_arms.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Abakan_Coat_of_arms.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:CooLio.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CooLio.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ShadowHalo 17:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Sorry I haven't responded on the talk page; I forgot about the image. Anyway, I've nominated it at IfD to get more input on whether or not the image should be used. —ShadowHalo 17:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem
Yeah, I saw that. No problem... —Wknight94 (talk) 14:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Inga Drozdova.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Inga Drozdova.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 11:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Version_2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Version_2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD
There is an AfD on Fischer's emdgame, see Articles for deletion/Fischer's endgame. Bubba73 (talk), 01:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Статус ваших изображений в Ру-Вики
Уважаемый участник, загляните, пожалуйста, в своё обсуждение в русской Википедии, очень многие загруженные вами изображения имеют проблемный статус.--Alex Spade 20:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Ernest Ivy Thomas, Jr. on DYK

 * I just came here to say the same thing. Very interesting article and a welcome addition, thanks. Harvey100 13:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Doenitz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Doenitz.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 18:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:VirtuallyJenna.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:VirtuallyJenna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. <font color="CEBE70">MECU ≈ talk 01:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:RAF Nell.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RAF Nell.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NAHID 10:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Shtormovoye oblako.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Shtormovoye oblako.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

I don't believe this image satisfies the requirement that "no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information"- specifically, free images of shelf clouds such as Image:Rolling-thunder-cloud.jpg are available. If you disagree, you can provide a fair use rationale for its use in that article. --Safalra 19:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)