User talk:Brandon/Archive 14

Nomination for deletion of Template:Non-free vector version available
Template:Non-free vector version available has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Quadell (talk) 22:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring
You are now deliberately engaging in WP:Edit warring on the Running Up that Hill page. Your source is not valid, you have been told this and continually revert anyway. I am reporting this. I am not considered to be engaged in the same because one exception to the three-reversion rule is the removal of improperly sourced material, which is what I am doing. You seem to be confusing WP with a fan page, where there are no standards for references. The problem is axiomatic: if information is important enough to be in this encyclopedia, it's important enough to source it properly. Either provide a non-Twitter source, or leave the assertion off the page until there is a reference considered reliable by WP standards. The world will not come to an end if every single example of Running Up That Hill being played on a TV show isn't listed. You seem to have a heavily vested interest in this, which is beyond reason at this point. I am asking you again to stop putting this in, and to stop being rude in your summaries and posts on the Talk page.--TEHodson 04:16, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I replied on the talk page. You are inventing standards that simply do not exist on Wikipedia. That article alone has seven links to YouTube, which falls under the same category as Twitter by Wikipedia policy. Brandon (talk) 04:24, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * YouTube is equally dodgey, but that can at least be viewed and one can see that indeed it is the artist named in the article. A Tweet is not the same because it's an electronically generated rumour, and your insistence that these are the real band members themselves doing the Tweeting is irrelevant. Get a proper source. In the meantime, a WP administrator will deal with it. I suggest you wait and see what they decide to do about it.--TEHodson 04:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * That one sentence is now better sourced than most of the article. Now that I've taken the time to do that, there are more important things needing to be done around here. Brandon (talk) 04:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Your sources are not considered reliable by WP standards. One is a company advertising for itself. Another is a commercial site to buy the song. The other two are Twitter. The sources for the main article, the Kate Bush section, are interviews and magazines. You are correct that the YouTube citations for the entire "covers" section are also not the best. But yours are worse, I'm sorry to say. I am once again reverting, and now that the report is in we'll let an administrator decide. Try to find someone who has reviewed the song, or the show and mentioned it. That's the sort of source WP wants, not stores or recording studios. We don't use Amazon, either, you may have noticed. I'm sorry this is so hard for you to deal with, but three bad sources are still not acceptable. Are you a member of the band yourself? You are coming off as though you are, and want your contribution noted.--TEHodson 04:43, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Dude, I have been editing Wikipedia since 2005, in the time racked up over 20,000 edits in addition to being an Administrator and CheckUser. I'm not seeing any conflict of interest. Brandon (talk) 04:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are an administrator, then you know perfectly well what constitutes a reliable source and shouldn't need me to tell you. In any case, it's out of our hands now. I will abide by the decision of whomever it is who deals with it.--TEHodson 04:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Running up that hill
Brandon, i saw your revert on that page and have reverted back to exclude the twitter feed. I placed a note on the talk page explaining this in detail. The short version is Twitter is not a reliable source, While WP:SocialMedia is a policy, the entry on the page fails #2 and #4 of that policy. Because the information purports to be from the singer herself, BLP most certainly applies. If you want the information in the article (it's not damaging or anything like that) you need a reliable source, twitter won't cut it. @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons ►  Moon Base Alpha  -@ 17:15, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Request for Interview Regarding Wikipedia Bots
Greetings Brandon-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a graduate student at the University of Oregon, currently collecting data for my dissertation on Wikipedia editors who create and use bots and assisted editing tools, as well as editors involved in the initial and/or ongoing creation of bot policies on Wikipedia. As a member of BAG and the bot community, I would very much like to interview you for the project at a time and in a method that is most convenient for you (Gchat, another IM client, Skype, email, telephone, etc.). I am completely flexible and can work with your schedule. The interview will take approximately 30-45 minutes.

My dissertation project has been approved both by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Oregon, and by the Research Committee at the Wikimedia Foundation. You can find more information on the project on my meta page.

Please let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to hearing from you to set up a time to chat. Thank you very much.

Randall Livingstone, School of Journalism & Communication, University of Oregon

UOJComm (talk) 00:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

109.169.0.0 & webhost (unblock-en)
Gday Brandon. To unblock-en we have someone enquiring on this block[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BlockList?wpTarget=109.169.0.0&limit=50] 08:23, 6 January 2011	109.169.0.0/18	no expiry set (unblock | change block)	Brandon (talk | contribs | block)	anon. only, account creation blocked	(webhost) requesting an unblock and with the comment that it is not sufficiently descriptive to understand. Are you able to better describe or provide detail to the block? Thanks. — billinghurst  sDrewth  00:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That IP range is owned by a web hosting company that provides shared hosting. They are often abused by long term vandals and sock puppets since you can get an account at most web hosts for $5/month. Unless the requestor has a good reason to be using a proxy (lives in Iran or something), it shouldn't really be approved. Brandon (talk) 22:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. — billinghurst  sDrewth  05:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Pokémon investigations
Pokémon investigations, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Pokémon investigations and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Pokémon investigations during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —danhash (talk) 14:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Your user page
Hi. Your user page needs an update. I would've done it myself, but SOMEBODY fully protected the page from editing. Also, the talk page message above is never going to get archived as it's missing a timestamp. You'll need to add a timestamp or manually archive it. Luh you, boo. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:46, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

CAKE


Commander v99 (talk) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message. --Commander v99 (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview
Dear Brandon,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:
 * Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
 * Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
 * All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
 * All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
 * The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk)23:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Abuse Filter on the Article Feedback Tool
Hey there :). You're being contacted because you're an edit filter manager, At the moment, we're developing Version 5 of the Article Feedback Tool, which you may or may not have heard about. If you haven't; for the first time, this will involve a free-text box where readers can submit comments :). Obviously, there's going to be junk, and we want to minimise that junk. To do so, we're working the Abuse Filter into the tool.

For this to work, we need people to write and maintain filters. I'd be very grateful if you could take a look at the discussion here and the attached docs, and comment and contribute! Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:09, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Carol Kirkwood
I granted an unprotect request for the article; please revert if you know something I don't. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:23, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Nina Burleigh protection
Brandon, we are talking over on the Nina Burleigh talk page about why its semi-protected? Does not appear to be a reason for this, seems like it went back to 2011. Any chance we can get you to remove that or at least a reason why it was done in the first place?Sgerbic (talk) 01:00, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied on talk. Brandon (talk) 22:10, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Holiday Cheer

 * P.S. Love the panda picture! My name is also Brandon and we both like pandas! Cool!  JHUbal 27  ( talk ) 21:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anheuser-Busch InBev


The article Anheuser-Busch InBev has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Just a promotional article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I am One of Many (talk) 04:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Sarah Baartman
Hi, thanks for the notice about the reversion. I find this a tricky article to edit. The subject naturally arouses strong feeling, plus, there are a lot of sites and sources promoting mistaken or exaggerated accounts of Baartman's experiences. I don't know much about sockpuppets: I thought people came to edit the article in good faith but all fired up with the wrong information. Usually all I add to history articles are contemporary newspaper references, but with this, I thought I might try to find an authoritative print biography before doing any more edits.RLamb (talk) 20:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Abuse of your Administrator privileges
I am just putting this as a note to all victims of this Administrator as well as all others who are concerned.

Now operating as Brandon, this admin uses multiple accounts and frequently engages in politically motivated attacks, retaliation, stalking of editors who he deems not to have a pro-Jewish POV etc. He as also leaked personal information about legitimate editors to people outside of Wikipedia. He works with administrators who exhibit similar behavior and engages in gang retaliation against Wikipedia editors both in Wikipedia as well as outside of Wikipedia.

This administrator, may be using another account now. He was previously operating as "BJWeeks" and has long been abusing his administrator privileges under multiple accounts, blocking editors for bogus reasons using false accusation backed up by his gang of admin. friends.Harris3433 (talk) 22:22, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Riiiiight. This is your first edit as "Harris3433", but you're obviously not new around here. What's more likely: you're engaging in bad behavior or Brandon is? --MZMcBride (talk) 00:29, 12 April 2013 (UTC)


 * lol. Brandon (talk) 04:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 16:00, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey! :) Brandon (talk) 17:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

David Pogue
Hi Brandon, just letting you know that I've downgraded the indef semi you placed on to pending changes. As I said in the log summary, feel free to revert if you disagree. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Help
Hello, you seem to be the expert in this, I don't know if I did anything wrong in reporting it? Thank you, MarioNovi (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 01:47, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

SVG format files
Hi, Brandon. I saw that you have uploaded a logo on Honda. May I ask, where do you convert this logo to SVG? I am trying very hard to find one as I want to upload logos to Wikipedia. Thanks, Nahnah4  |  Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here!  |  No Editcountitis!  09:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I manually converted all of the logos that I uploaded in SVG format. Brandon (talk) 07:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello!
Hello Wiki Administrator, I was wondering if you're still on! Nick2crosby (talk) 03:28, 30 May 2015 (UTC)